Since the dawn of civilization, people have been concerned about the happiness and its definition. Nowadays, with the advent of technology, life and its meaning are changing dramatically and this phenomenon is not inevitable. In this regard, there is a controversy amongst people that many of them believe that because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in past. Personally speaking, I am not in favor of this approach. I assert my viewpoint for two reasons and will illustrate them in the following.
The first facet to be mentioned is that after the invent of technology life has become more simple. To be more clear, the lifestyle that has been provided by the advent of technology has eliminated many hardships from man's life. Difficulties such as providing healthy water for the cooking and hygiene utilizations, growth in transportation and communications, Thus due to the fact that life gets easier than before, I conclude that it becomes happier. To clarify my point, take a university student as an example. Many years ago, a university student had to endure many difficulties to study his lesson and incomplete his assignments, there was no internet, therefore he has to look up for his questions in books which, required a lot of time and energy and he might not be able to dedicate part of his time to entertaining. On the other hand, today's students have a lot of free time due to the fact that they can do their home works in a more confined duration, thus they can engage with lots of fun activity that bring joy to them and thrill them. This example helps me to illustrate my point that, less labor provides less sadness and more labor provides less happiness.
Apart from the point discussed above, today's urban life provides an environment in which people can experience many kinds of entertainments. There are many community centers, park, cinema and clubs which were not abundant in the past. These centers were designed in order to let people have fun and entertain themselves and observation has shown that these places are always filled with happy and laughing people. A smile on face indicates the happiness one is having. Let me take myself as an example, I take advantage of these forgoing center to blow off my steam and make myself happy and I always get good results. On the other hand, many years ago there were no such places in which people could gain their energy back, thus their sadness accumulated inside them and made them become depressed gradually.
All in all, according to the aforementioned points and example, I believe the speed of life is not a good indicator of one's happiness. I cling to my viewpoint with the mentioned reasons. However, there are opposing points of view based on which people take the speed of time as a measurement of happiness but from the standpoint of being realistic, I think the most important reason to be happy cannot be the speed of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...sfied with their lives than people were in past. Personally speaking, I am not in favor...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rst facet to be mentioned is that after the invent of technology life has become more simp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...peed of life is not a good indicator of ones happiness. I cling to my viewpoint with...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, apart from, as to, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2478.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81165048544 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71507835714 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495145631068 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 790.2 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9775013436 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5238095238 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226287103519 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635492478745 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106030514756 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153934942638 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116957395459 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.