Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
Space exploration has become a significant appealing issue in the modern era which obviously attracts a great amount of attention. One eminent and controversial question which comes up in this regard is that whether it is a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration or not. While an overwhelming majority firmly believes that space exploration has no determined benefits for humans so funding for it should be immediately eliminated, the others exactly hold the opposite perspective. I think expending money on space exploration would be extremely beneficial owing to some highlighted reasons. The ensuing paragraphs will substantially elaborate on my points of view.
The most exquisite point is that probing the universe has been persistently humans’ dream which was exceedingly preoccupied researchers’ mind for a prolonged time. Space investigation can approximately fulfill humans’ dream so it deserves putting money and time. For example, I and my friends in the school always love space and knowing about its attractive mysteries. Therefore, I think space investigation can answer humans question and broaden our horizon about the universe which gives us the feeling of satisfaction. Searching for humans’ questions is valuable as well as interesting consequently government should devote money to it.
Another considerable reason is that space exploration would be mandatory in future due to humans’ requirement for energy and resource. Humans have exploited almost all the available resources and energy in the earth and now we face serious problem for providing resource and energy for our lives. Exploring space would discover new resources for us which would protect humans’ live. For instance, one recent survey which has been accomplished in Yale University has indicated that Mars planet probably contains oil. If humans can utilize this oil, it would rescue human form lack of resources concern. Consequently, space exploration would be profitable.
In addition, space exploration would create lucrative income for the government because they can utilize their results in journals and books to earn money. There are a lot of people who are dramatically interested in reading books and journals about novel space exploration. Therefore, it would be a significant opportunity for the government to compensate the money has been spending for exploration. For instance, the United State government invests quite a lot of money in exploration but they sell the fascinating published results for recovering their investment budget. Space exploration not only does increase our knowledge but also can utterly increase income. It demonstrates that space exploration is not a waste of money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to put', 'to putt'.
Suggestion: to put; to putt
...lfill humans' dream so it deserves putting money and time. For example, I and my f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2347.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60143198091 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17191223417 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541766109785 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5678097732 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.681818182 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0454545455 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270160526474 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976486497224 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061289949847 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182428453747 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455006849909 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.