To increase the price of fuel is the only way to reduce air pollution. To what extent do you agree
or disagree? Use your own experience as examples.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to fuel price and air pollution. The root cause for air pollution is fossil fuel. While it is possible to claim that the fuel price increment is the solution for air pollution, my point of view that there is no correlation between fuel price and air pollution. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad of disadvantages gain for a nation when they increase the price of fuel such as availability, confidentiality, integrity, internal data encapsulation, and vehicle export demand. Apart from that, it will affect usability, portability and life quality of citizens. For example, fuel price has changed the political views of China in the last year. Therefore, it is trusted by the citizens that the fuel price increase as the major positive factor for the government, and they think in political angle.
On the other hand, there are other options that the scientist think as a solution to air pollution such as wind power, water power, and solar power. The toxic smoke adds to the environment from fossil fuel, but wind or solar energy are the possible other sustainable solutions. Other solutions have implemented in China, and they have reduced air pollution as well as other pollutions in certain regions in China.
Therefore, it is accepted that natural solar energy, wind power and water energy as the best solution for air pollution. In conclusion, it is believed by the scientist that the fuel formula in the monopoly fuel market is the key to decide the fuel price. In nutshell, it is strongly believed that governments should invest more fund on solar energy as the best quality solution for air pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 312.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95833333333 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71486089414 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49358974359 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1073177709 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203618469592 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782029319398 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534409766425 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126522178096 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550470154475 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.