Some parents, specifically mothers, stay at home instead working, and some people think That they should receive monetary compensation from the government. Do you agree or disagree?
Of late, many women stay at home to take care of their children and elder people. There is a thought from few people that the government should provide financial benefits for them, in order to live independently. In my opinion, I strongly disagree to this thought, as this will increase financial burden on the government, encourage many working women to stay at home and women will not find any avenue to improve their knowledge by being at home.
Firstly, the government is already providing financial aids to older people across the country, which is incurring huge financial burden. IF the government plans to provide monetary compensation to women staying at home, which will force the financial ministry to find new ways of income, at the end new taxes will be introduced to find the money. For instance, in Tamil Nadu a new tax was introduced to find the fund for paying old people's pension, which will add more burdens on common people.
Secondly, when women stay at home which will create more dependency on their husbands, which will create conflicts between them. For example, my friend's wife was working post delivery she resigned her job to take of their kid. Internal conflicts between the couple raised due to insufficient financial expectation of wife, which lead to divorce. Thus, it has been believe that women stay at home will create monetary dependency on their husbands, which could be avoided if both parents go to work.
Finally, women stay at home their knowledge will be very limited which will not help them to reach better career prospects. Furthermore, women empowerment is becoming the talk of the town, which could be only achieved when women are employed.
In conclusion, when women stay at home, this will reduce their opportunity to learn new things. Moreover, financial dependency would arise which will result unwanted argument between many families. Hence, In my view women should be employed to live independently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...hich lead to divorce. Thus, it has been believe that women stay at home will create mon...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07098765432 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59446397774 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1593430081 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.533333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130858027772 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552621859273 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442398560289 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872153776768 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411253923157 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.