The author in the reading describes three solutions that can be used to prevent the extinction of frog species from the nature. The speaker says that solutions do not seem to be practical and she also represents the points to support her claim.
First, to restrict the farmers to use pesticide in the farmland is not the ultimate solution. Farmers use pesticides in order to grow more food crops; preventing them from using pesticides might cause them to undergo sufferings as they get fewer crops in this case. Additionally, it makes harder for them to be a good competitor in the market.
Second, another solution is to use antifungal to resist the attack of fungus which is responsible to skin dehydration of the frog. On the other hand, the lecture states that it will be a arduous process to individually treat all frogs by antifungal. She also mentions that this whole process will be too high-priced and difficult.
Third, the writer claims that reduction of the use and development of water from lakes or wetlands also lessen the decline of frog habitat and ultimately frog species. However, the professor accuses the rapid global warming, which is the main culprit for the reduction of watery area which is the natural habitat of frog species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...and, the lecture states that it will be a arduous process to individually treat a...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92488262911 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63981722303 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596244131455 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6772091832 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35920928567 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132987026642 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101519293172 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195875402 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675177000323 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.