Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be

Man is known to be the most intelligent creature on this planet. In that case, he knows to learn from mistakes made by himself or as well as others. It is man’s tendency to go according to the famous Russian quotes ‘verify even though you trust’. Analogically speaking, I agree with the given prompt. To focus the attention on the problems, scandals are useful than that of the fascinating speakers because they are the ones who try to persuade the minds of human but do not get to have impact as much as the scandals have had. The viable substantiations germane to my assertion would make it more definitive.

Firstly, the speaker or any reformer as given in the prompt, are the set of people who may be the great orators. But, the history had vast number of demagogues and gerrymanders. For example, during national elections of India in the year 2015, the opponents of Mr.Modi (the than prime minister candidate) was accused falsely of many scams. Despite of being held in great number of venality, the Congress party ‘reformers’ tried to gainsay against the political rules of Modi and accused him of many charges making people falsely focus on their ‘made up stories’ about him. Lacking of evidence to their accusations made them concede in the race to rule the nation. Analogically, sometimes the reformers may goad people to dive into their perceptions rather then actual problem. Hence, the original effect to society by means of scams helps us to understand where the real problem lies at.

Moreover, experience makes the man learn more. The society has lots of loop holes even though man tries to build it in the most sophisticated manner. To exemplify, India- Despite being the biggest democracy in the world and the laws for each denizen being so carefully crafted, experienced the worst scams like 2G spectrum scam, Commonwealth Scam, IPL Scam, and so on. This helps us to understand directly where our weak points lie resulting in adding more sophistication for the posterity to live.

Some times even though the mistakes may get costlier or the cure from those mistakes made by man takes time, eventually the success earned at the end is sweet. Great scientists like Thomas Alva Edison failed thousands of times during their experiments experiencing the loss in turn leading them them to achieve lots more than that. Similarly, we have to learn from the mistakes that are made. Hence, scandals- in the form of mistakes are important aspect to concentrate on the problems to solve more than bare speeches.

In a nutshell, the prompt makes one dive into analyzing the characteristics of human being. According to the given substantiations, even though the mistakes made are costlier, the aspects learnt from them matters a lot than the aspects learnt from barely listening to someone who may be a good orator.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the set of people who may be the great orators. But, the history had vast numbe...
^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Modi
...a in the year 2015, the opponents of Mr.Modi the than prime minister candidate was a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...e to dive into their perceptions rather then actual problem. Hence, the original eff...
^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: them
...s experiencing the loss in turn leading them them to achieve lots more than that. Similar...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, then, well, for example, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98747390397 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8302679416 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565762004175 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7855693291 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.869565217 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8260869565 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0989054308957 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0260459258075 0.0831039109588 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035942855927 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528924381 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475862029949 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.