It has been more than thirty thousand years since the major evolution of the mankind have started from it’s ancestors. While centuries pass by, human tended to be known as the most intelligent creature on the planet majorly attributing his capability of remembering whatever he wanted to, to this aspect. Human being tend to learn from each and every aspect that he/she encounter in his/her surroundings. In this contemporary society, the socio-economic conflicts have become worse that it affects the psychic ability of the human brain making it not able to discern if the views of others are benign or not. Hence, we learn more from the confluous views of people whose views we share with rather than from one whose views contradicts with our’s.
Learning ability of the human brain depends on how the learning is done. Even in the times of Ramayana (a great Hindu mythological period), considering the words of woman Manthara, Kaike sent her son Lord Rama and his wife Seeta for an exile of fourteen years. Manthara always persuaded the mind of Kaike and set her views right with respect to Kaike so that she could use it in a proper time.Thus it can be asserted analogically considering this substantiation that we learn more from the words of one who’s views we share with but not the one that is antipathy to ours’.
Contradictory statements by the people tend to give the effect of hatredness to the human. For example, in the recent ICC cricket Champions’ world cup of 2018, the new Indian captain Virat Kohli took the decisions without considering the views of the former well experienced captain MS Dhoni at certain times. This in an inhibit manner leading to the loss of the team. Human beings tend to be opposite to the people that guide us by tweaking our thoughts therefore, failing to learn.
The statement given is assertive to the large scaled manner too. Speaking about industries, Nokia which was emerged to be one of the greatest cell phone companies in the beginning of the 21st century collapsed exponentially in the market value as the contradictory statements about it’s than Symbian Operating system. Without learning from the opposite internal views of it’s well wishers failing to considering them as one, the CEO of the company experienced huge loss. Human brain considers the person who is opposing them as the enemy even before considering the after effects of the statement made.
In a nutshell, from the given substantiations, it can be definitively asserted that the human brain learns in more effective manner from the confluous thoughts of others rather than the opposite ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'encounters'.
Suggestion: encounters
... from each and every aspect that he/she encounter in his/her surroundings. In this contem...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
... that she could use it in a proper time.Thus it can be asserted analogically conside...
^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... that she could use it in a proper time.Thus it can be asserted analogically conside...
^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tain MS Dhoni at certain times. This in an inhibit manner leading to the loss of the team....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f others rather than the opposite ones.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, speaking about, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04090909091 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78958733878 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538636363636 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3253437904 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.470588235 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8823529412 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229394739018 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715006469271 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972635704905 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130294773636 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638780651909 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.