As everything in life is like a coin that has two different sides, people must weight the pros and cons before jumping to conclusions. After all, every question requires a careful deliberation in that there are always multiple variables to a truth. Even though some would adamantly believe that it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for extended hours than, to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours, I think such opinion lacks coherence to some extent. In my humble opinion, I disagree with the statement that It is more enjoyable to have a job where someone works only three days a week for extended hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours because of the following reasons.
First and foremost, the majority of individuals would agree with the notion that is working regular hours for five days as a full-time job is more comfortable in people life. The main reason behind this rationale is that when people work regular hours like start at 7 am to 5 pm this make their life healthier, like waking up every morning at the same time, and doing exercises and the list goes on. To illustrate more thoroughly, when a teacher organizes his schedule with full-time hours, he has fix hours every day to spend with his children and his family, so he can so easily arrange other programs. On the other hand, if a teacher works for three days for longer hours, this would make him so confuse because he might be unable to arrange any other program because his schedule not fix. Consequently, regularly working for five days can make people life so healthy and can arrange more than one activity in one day.
Another excellent point to mention here that working for three days might make people lose their consistency, because they work for part-time, and they might miss much information every day which might have a negative impact on productivity. Conversely, workers that work full time for five days have a significant effect on increasing the production because they regularly work every day, and they obtain much information every day, which can enhance opportunities to provide new ideas and even solve any obstacle that might face, which has a direct impact on productivity. So, working five days with regular hours can increase coworkers consistency, productivity, and creativity.
In summation, yes, it is virtually impossible to provide a completely satisfying answer to an open-ended question. Although the jury may be out on this topic essay, we can come to a mutual agreement that it is working five days with shorter hours will be more enjoyable than working three days with longer hours due to the reasons and details mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nion, I disagree with the statement that It is more enjoyable to have a job where...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs because of the following reasons. First and foremost, the majority of indi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nge more than one activity in one day. Another excellent point to mention here ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...uctivity. Conversely, workers that work full time for five days have a significant effect...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istency, productivity, and creativity. In summation, yes, it is virtually impos...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, if, may, so, after all, even so, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2269.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79704016913 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57005246001 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467230443975 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7192182331 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.071428571 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.7857142857 20.6045352989 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.543596999282 0.236089414692 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202731694248 0.076458572812 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.222893283548 0.0737576698707 302% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338149395514 0.150856017488 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.215464013714 0.0645574589148 334% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 11.7677419355 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.