The ploblem of whether should give youngster aging under 18 years old full-time studying or not have always been controversial. In my perspective, it is beneficial somehow to let youngster learn full time; however, if the parents want their children to develop both mentally and physically, other things apart from studying have to be taken into account.
On one hand, young people in the age under 18 should be offered full-time tuition attributed to some strict social norm that people could only lie on education to get a brighter future and enhance the living standard. Having a thoroughly acknowledgement of many school subjects like maths, literatures, physics would guarantee the chance of making an entrance to college but not the success and satisfaction. On top of that, keeping youngster occupied with school tasks would prevent them from addiction to many temptation. For example, youngster are easily prone to technological devives like video games, phones or social media and worsely, they could addict to drugs or coccaine without adults's inspectation. To sum up, it is reasonably valid to arrange a full-time studying schedule for youngster but it is not enough to make their life colorful and motivated.
On another hand, people under 18 years old are in necessity for proactive and energetic lifestyle more than just dealing with school work. For example, youngster have a tendency to be forced to focus on homework and assignments at school and not given permission to hang out with classmates or fellows which deter them from building social bond and unwinding from stress. According to a China's statistic, the suicide rate among adolescent between 15 and 18 is alarmingly soaring, and the same pattern occured in Korea and Japan. That is the most direct incentive to encourage youngster to have a meaningful life by taking up out door activities and spoiling themselves when they are still young. As a matter of fact, the school clubs are available widely and varied in domain such as art, music, sports, dancing that student could choose one and have a crack at it. By and large, parents should not place limitation on their children's outdoor activities, insteadly, could help to balance out the activities and studying.
In conclusion, i fervently believe academic studying plays a key role to have a stable and qualified life; nonetheless, young people should be given chance to immerse in their enthusiasm and good relationship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...neficial somehow to let youngster learn full time; however, if the parents want their chi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to full'
Suggestion: to full
...neficial somehow to let youngster learn full time; however, if the parents want thei...
^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('thoroughly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('acknowledgement') instead of another adjective.
...and enhance the living standard. Having a thoroughly acknowledgement of many school subjects like maths, lit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun temptation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many temptations'.
Suggestion: many temptations
...ks would prevent them from addiction to many temptation. For example, youngster are easily pron...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ake their life colorful and motivated. On another hand, people under 18 years o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, by and large, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1625 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78769506044 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.8258970294 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2276050315 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756545989076 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695457836841 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138882760586 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020314136579 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.