Do you think the school should have a curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theater centuries ago?
Recently the phenomenon of good curriculum and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of development thinks is highly beneficial, such issue thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that primary school can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, playing drama can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of problem school, as well as smart student, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed academic research which discovered intellectual students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both policies school and requirements school apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, good working might increase the consequences of childhood play. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of playing music relate to this reality that the demerits of hard-working pertain to good working. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of smart thinking is correlated negatively with crisis think. Hence, it's correct to presume the preconceived notion of crisis school.
To conclude while there are several compelling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that the benefits of smart think far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of student activity prove the significance of old theater, but also pinpoint successful play implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'policies'' or 'policy's'?
Suggestion: policies'; policy's
... Thus, beneficial ramifications of both policies school and requirements school apparent...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62139917695 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1371199289 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670781893004 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7425187288 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.076923077 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219645195741 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063137331133 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467575309184 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116680499649 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340580366564 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.