In many less developed countries, the gap in the standard of living between the city and countryside is very large. What are the reasons? How could the gap be reduced?
It is generally acknowledged fact that the living standard between urban and rural areas is becoming greater and all-pervasive, especially in third world countries in this modern world than ever before.
In this essay, the writer has intention to delve in determining the contributory factors as well as propose the appropriate remedies for the challenging question of reducing social gap between developed regions and countryside.
There are various underlying motives involved in the increasing of economic and living condition standard in urban cities and the limitation of rural development in developing nations.
The most frequent cause to be considered is that the availability of adequate educational facilities in urban city areas has contributed tangible and immediate benefits to the local community, producing skilled workforce and paving the way for economic growth. urbanist are having higher chance of well-rounded education, which is an essential foundation to a knowledge driven economy and well-being society.
As the result, allowing citizens to secure employment and earn regular income to maintain and improve their standard of living.
Another factor which has equal impact is the ready availability of complete and affordable health care and medical service definitely is a top mark of civilized social development. Also, the comprehensive and convenience transportation system makes public health care become accessible, thus, promoting social welfare and driving residents feel assured living and working.
In order to elaborate the above-mention root causes, there are certain of constructive suggestions that should be considered in order to improve the social benefits of rural provinces.
First and most importantly, the policy of shifting industrial and commercial zones to rural area, a cure-all for this burning issue, should be put into practice with the serious and solid support from the authority and manufacturers.
Eventually, with the high rise of new businesses settle down to these areas could result in creating more job opportunities, encouraging regional development, increasing household earning and income, helping impoverished family shake off poverty.
One further attracting method is that government and authority should coordinate budgeting to accommodate the realistic demand such as educational institutions, hospitals, clinics, public transport and road condition to secure labour workforce, avoiding city migration of rural population.
To recapitulate, the incontestable trend of social gap raises tough challenge and likely to be unmanageable in those less developed countries, I hold the belief that this social economic matter can be fully resolved provided that the authority along with locals have effective method for management as well as realistic, brilliant plans to allocate government funding and resources to maintain community equality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Urbanist
...and paving the way for economic growth. urbanist are having higher chance of well-rounde...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, third, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2494.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8820754717 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1034724864 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608490566038 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 506.74238477 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.0539943913 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.846153846 106.682146367 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6153846154 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.38176352705 251% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172853546342 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053893478341 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487990891729 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0611029942877 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497054037161 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 13.0946893788 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 13.62 50.2224549098 27% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 11.3001002004 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.42 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.37 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 78.4519038076 210% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.