The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Three different types of the United Kingdom’s phone call durations between 1995 and 2002 are illustrated in the graph. Overall, there were two kinds of telephone call (cellular and national and international) experienced an increasing trend, while the local call was fluctuating. In addition, the highest number of phone call duration observed in 1999.
The local – fixed-line witnessed as the biggest number in the reported years. In the first years, it stood at approximately 70 million. Then, in three following years (1996 to 1999), the figure showed a similar pattern, increasing at around 5 million a year, and, reaching to the peak number in 1999 (90 million). Following which, the figure decreased steadily and ending the period at around 85 million in 2002.
In 1995, the number of minutes for the national and international calls was half that of the local. Then, it saw a slight increase (around 4 million per year) from 1996 to 2001 and finished 65 million in the final year. Furthermore, the figure for the mobile call was the lowest among the group. It stood just below 5 million in 1995 and finished about a ten-fold increase in 2002.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94329896907 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71451834432 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8009689235 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1818181818 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157615477897 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655880865039 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408982875767 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10969554171 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289041416837 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.