Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural background living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree?
Each country is competing hard enough to become a world leader. Some believe that this development can be geared up if immigrants from different nations are included into the country. I completely agree with this belief and in my essay, I will elucidate my viewpoint with relevant examples.
Firstly, having trans-national population in a country, brings in abundance of cross-culture. Furthermore, people in the home-country get an exposure to the varied languages, which is beneficial for them, when they are introduced into the job market or for higher studies abroad. For example, people from countries having first language as English or French, if interact with Asian population having minimal exposure to these languages, it becomes easier for the Asian population to grab jobs in the English-speaking countries. If these nationals are allowed to immigrate in a country, the standard of living of the local population and ultimately the nation improves.
Secondly, citizens from different countries, bring along with them a plethora of skill-sets. It is an undeniable fact that one country does not hold expertise in all the fields, and need to learn from their counterparts in foreign countries. To illustrate, Japanese are believed to have a strong manufacturing domain knowledge, their presence may prove to be an asset to the automobile industry. Also, Indians are believed to be leaders in farm technologies, this may be of advantage to countries having inferior knowledge of agriculture.If there is heterogeneity in skills, there will be more employment, and the economy of a country will improve manifold.
In conclusion, I concur that having cross-national population brings in a variety of culture and skill set, which ultimately brings in more job opportunities, subsequently, increasing the economy of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 539, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...aving inferior knowledge of agriculture.If there is heterogeneity in skills, there...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49473684211 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24414381115 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575438596491 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4434997884 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235511009738 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079943893891 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350986955846 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126343353672 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038825303423 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.