Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural background living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree?
In this age of globalization, some countries are unlocking rapid development. There is a growing debate that whether or not such developments reflect the outcome of a cosmopolitan setup. I completely agree that when people representing diverse nationality and cultural background gather together, it ultimately boost country's progress through creation of cross-cultural business opportunity and exchange of scientific innovation, and in this essay I will analyze this in detail.
To begin with, countries that encourage diversity often have larger investment and international business partnerships which help their economy to grow faster. In other words, when a country allow immigrants and individuals of multi-ethncity, it creates the opportunity to develope business plans with friends from neighboring countries and continents that are geographically far away. A national policy encouraging immigration and free-economy attract participation of multicultural community which eventually reduce the distance as a barrier of pursuing business with another country. As a result, more international funding and possibilities to export and import more items arise. these enables more local job, and profits for the local stakeholders of the country. For example, China's economic development started to grow two time faster in last decade when more people from Europe and America started to go and live their for work and business purposes.
In addition to that, when people from many nationals live in the same country, it helps the scientific research of the country. Number of technological invention can be higher annually due to the merge of local and foreign researcher. To elaborate, local scientists and researchers receive the benefit to share and develop ideas with talents from other country, which in many cases involves unique approach to a scientific problem. Also, chances of innovations from foreign markets and institutes get introduced to these countries earlier than the rest. As a result, technological advancement of these countries automatically move in higher speed. For instance, USA is on the top of scientific research success due to a growing community of scientists and engineers from diverse background in Silicon Valley.
To conclude, the above discussion clearly indicates that countries with multicultural social environment grow much faster than the other countries. If countries can identify how their economic growth and science and technology can be benefitted through welcoming diversity, then necessary step to encourage such community can be highly empowering for the country's development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lopment. There is a growing debate that whether or not such developments reflect the outcome o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'boosts'?
Suggestion: boosts
...ckground gather together, it ultimately boost countrys progress through creation of c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rants and individuals of multi-ethncity, it creates the opportunity to develope b...
^^
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... to export and import more items arise. these enables more local job, and profits for...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 193, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...invention can be higher annually due to the merge of local and foreign researcher. To el...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, in many cases, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79948586118 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19535517143 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560411311054 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8068211565 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.705882353 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8823529412 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269759846947 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783345397463 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579061388313 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159931598104 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041090177196 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.