Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions.
The quality of life in large cities got hampered in recent years by different reasons including population growth, unemployment and terror attack. As each city has it's own reasons, the solutions would be unique too depending on the individual circumstances of each metropolitan area.Therefore, each city should conduct own research to find out the most appropriate solution, as well as the cause. Here I will analyse the basic causes and will try to outline the ideal solutions to keep the quality of life up in large cities.
First of all, large cities are not only facing too many migration from rural areas of the country. But they are also accommodating people from less developed country. Everyone is moving to bigger cities in a hope of better lifestyle and financial independence. But apparently, this over crowded situation is making the living more challenging by causing the transportation system busier, job recruitment competitive and sometime rise in whole living cost. People are earning the same amount of money, but the rental expenses has increased as the city did not get better. Moreover, more and more homeless people are moving to this areas causing it difficult to confirm a good lifestyle for them as they usually do not work.
On the other hand, it is high time to find some solution to ensure the quality of life does not go lower anymore. Each government can take own initiative to make sure the the public services and other benefits stay up to the mark does not matter how crowded it gets. In addition, free economy can help to welcome more businesses what will automatically support the young employment building a strong economy. Lastly, increasing security system should be the top priority considering the terror attack in big cities last few years.
To sum ups, large cities are the heart of business, tourism and entertainment. Therefore, the quality of life can face challenges easily in this super fast modern time. But making sure the top class service, security and lifestyle in general through some systematic plan can vanish the challenges easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...circumstances of each metropolitan area.Therefore, each city should conduct own research ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun migration seems to be countable; consider using: 'many migrations'.
Suggestion: many migrations
...l, large cities are not only facing too many migration from rural areas of the country. But th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... and more homeless people are moving to this areas causing it difficult to confirm a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...nt can take own initiative to make sure the the public services and other benefits stay...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...nt can take own initiative to make sure the the public services and other benefits stay...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... plan can vanish the challenges easily.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in general, as well as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07225433526 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7427075648 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9839725781 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6875 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220935532428 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703788296721 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628587194111 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130521030341 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603569236115 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.