New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is clear that updating lastly modern technologies in high-speed communication have a major benefit to fill potentiality of youngsters. While some people argued that these spend much leisurely time face to face on screen of smart phone or any other technological devices. I personally acknowledge that advantages compensate obviously for disadvantages.
On the one hand, the majority of children is always learning bad behaviours day-to-day of their parents such as using smart phone or computer accounted for 6 to 8 hours working in companies. Moreover, the physical activities in outside, festival or amusement are ignore to chit chat with their friends on the internet, even access to fake news and innumerable uncivilized actions on social network. As a consequence, the high rate diseases of brain or psychology disorder emerge more in children than elderly people due to using unnecessary technology as soon as only a child.
On the other hand, the progress in sciences in the recent years permit children who have more opportunities to receive modern educational method in any level in school. Firstly, youngsters will be able to broaden their knowledge in expectancy for a viral development of their capabilities. Furthermore, learning on the internet are encouraged by application technologies. For instance, remote areas is facing in the lack of material facilities can easily to approach learning method in long distance and guarantee a equally chance to have competitive with children in urban city. Secondly, evolution of artificial intelligences give fully survival skill of global citizen as soon as possible for children.
In conclusion, although tendency technology for children has always biggest fear for parents and social in some aspects. But practical positive impact for progress of kids are undeniable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'ignored'.
Suggestion: ignored
...s in outside, festival or amusement are ignore to chit chat with their friends on the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rge more in children than elderly people due to using unnecessary technology as s...
^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...g method in long distance and guarantee a equally chance to have competitive with...
^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('equally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('chance') instead of another adjective.
...g method in long distance and guarantee a equally chance to have competitive with children in ur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'always the biggest'.
Suggestion: always the biggest
...gh tendency technology for children has always biggest fear for parents and social in some asp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal positive impact for progress of kids are undeniable.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5371024735 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12976478139 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639575971731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7191063604 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.538461538 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171258339145 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053251919692 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282376534191 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979034593347 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319161659268 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.