If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Whether a goal should be attained by all means can be weighed in many aspects. Some say that all the measures taken to attain the goal are reasonable if the goal is worthy enough, while others hold the opposite opinion that some measures should not be taken in any situations. Indeed, goal is more likely to attain if all the potential measures are not restricted. However, I strongly believe that some actions should not be taken even if the ultimate goal is important because those might result in negative consequences. In the following paragraphs, I will illustrate the idea from a social, and an environmental view of point.
Admittedly, it is justifiable for some goals to be attained by any means. It is especially true in terms of human right. Human right is basic need for everyone that allow no invasion. Sexual abuse, racial discrimination, disability discrimination are the kind of invasion of human right which still exist world-widely. However, we can see more and more people protest for those notorious situations and even fight for the victims. Though the action they take may be violent, no one would blame on the protesters. Take Hong Kong for example. As the government started to restrict the freedom of speech, citizens protested for the right they once had. Though they threatened to burn down the council or assaulted the local police officers, they are still supported by most of the democratic countries as they were merely fighting for their own right. Thus, some goal should be attained by all means and the process is justifiable.
Nevertheless, aside from the exception, some measures should not be taken in most of the case. In pursuit of goal, those measures that might do harm to other innocent should not even be considered no matter how important the goal is. Otherwise, those who commit the actions would be punished severely. Take ISIS for instance. The organization killed many people randomly and even threatened to bomb other countries. Though their religious and political goal was extremely worthwhile for them, the bloody actions the organization has taken were inhuman and intolerable that the organization were destroyed by many countries. Thus, the measures in the process of attaining goal should not involve in innocent people.
Furthermore, people should not take the measures that are malign to themselves. If they do not consider the negative effect of the measures they take, the negative consequences may outweigh the advantages they attain in such a way. For instance, In order to impulse the development of economy, factories and power plants are populated densely in my country legally. It is common to see factories which exhaust toxic fume in rural areas. Though GDP has been increasing in recent years, people are suffering from various pollutions. Now the government has to face the problem that ten out of three people in my country suffers from lethal disease which decrease the possibility for the foreign investment. Therefore, the measures which would cause more negative problems should not be taken.
In sum, aside from some goal, not all the measures could be taken in pursuit of the goal. If one take the measures that are not morally right or even have potential problems, the result will backfire no matter how attractive and worthwhile the goal is.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether a goal should be attained by all means ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2794.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72445976145 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461818181818 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1846065659 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1290322581 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7419354839 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90322580645 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158450630344 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490395993718 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350312413244 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972388200529 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193897559917 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.