TPO 43
The reasding an the listening materials have a debate on an special type of animals (agnostides) that lived in ancient oceans. one side believe that they couldn't be lived while other side bring reasons to support his opposition. Indeed, the penman puts forward 3 main theories that are disapproved by the orator.
First of all, the writer suggest that agnostides were hunters as well as other types of arthropods were predators. The speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, the evidences that provided by fossils illustrates that agnostides weren't well developed type of animals which means that they didn't have strong ability to see around themselves.
The second point offered by the author is that, agnostides have setteled down on the floor of the ocean same as other kinds of initial arthropods. Conversely, the lecturer casts doubt on this assumption by saying that agnostides didn't have the ability to move fast to other areas. Consequently, it seems unsuitable for them because they couldn't scape from dangers around. In fact they needed to in long distances to live easier.
Third, The reading passage proposes that it is a suggestion about agnostides to be a member of parasites family, the reading indicades that there are a huge number of modern arthropods that exist as parasites. On the other hand, the professor holds a different prespective about parasites. He mentions that agnostides weren't a very large population so they couldn't kill organisms they lived on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
The reasding an the listening materials have a debate o...
^^
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: an; the
The reasding an the listening materials have a debate on an...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...he listening materials have a debate on an special type of animals agnostides that...
^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...gnostides that lived in ancient oceans. one side believe that they couldnt be lived...
^^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ient oceans. one side believe that they couldnt be lived while other side bring reasons...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... by fossils illustrates that agnostides werent well developed type of animals which me...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...d type of animals which means that they didnt have strong ability to see around thems...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...is assumption by saying that agnostides didnt have the ability to move fast to other ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... seems unsuitable for them because they couldnt scape from dangers around. In fact they...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... parasites. He mentions that agnostides werent a very large population so they couldnt...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... werent a very large population so they couldnt kill organisms they lived on.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, if, second, so, third, well, while, in fact, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13414634146 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6546925293 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9691174955 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1538461538 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431293592381 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130075641499 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765915293404 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246152971004 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420402427189 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.