The author agrees with the statement that adequate measures are not in place to recycle waste from homes. The situation, however, can improve if the government or local authority decides to put legal restrictions on the waste management process.
For instance, it is compulsory for the residents in the city of Bangalore to divide the waste into several categories such as hazardous, bio-waste and recyclable waste and discard it in separate containers. There is a fine for the offenders and the Cleaner also refuses to take the waste if the rules are not followed. The net collected recyclable waste is sold at the end of the month for a sum which bring incentives to society in terms of money.
Further, I believe if one cannot put in necessary efforts, people should form groups or societies to recycle and manage the waste in a more fruitful manner. There is another law which focuses on the society rather than an individual. An example of this is the organic compost plant established in my society which accepts bio-waste from houses and converts it into fertilizer. The product is then spread in the gardens which helps in returning the nutrition to the soil.
The above two ideas which I have observed in my locality seems to give a pretty fair idea that regulations are needed to increase the recycling efficiency. If such laws are not in place, the habitants would not be aware of the mistakes they are doing and the harm they are bringing to our planet. In addition to this, the author also believes an awareness campaign on proper waste management activities can educate the citizens.
To conclude, the rules and regulations help in making more people to take actions towards recycling. Not only rules, incentives can also be introduced to lure more participants thus making it a carrot and stick policy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, thus, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90967741935 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67917548315 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558064516129 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2997359316 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293607376726 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090354728753 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474470948911 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148467198096 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278684624177 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.