In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
The author of the statement concludes that the beginner is more likely than authority to make significant achievement. While the others believe that having expert in everything is considerably vital without any doubt. I agree with this claim. Consider the both views in what follows, and then my point would be delineated.
To begin with, we all know that having a fresh spirit have a great deal of avid is highly imperative for doing huge contributions in the community. As a matter of fact, beginners are youth; we know that young people have a considerable amount of energy which it makes massive works in the society. One of the striking examples for this issue is pertaining to the academic setting. Indeed, majority of student in the university have a fresh soul who they can invent worthwhile tools in the college. Nevertheless, a variety of professors have a tired spirit, in fact their impetus has diminished during the time. As a consequence, we can conclude that beginners are indispensable criteria for fulfilling remarkable task in the world.
However, there is a crucial point for this issue. All of us know that having an excessive amount of experience would be precious for every task in the society. For instance, finding a curative approach for cancer needs to a plethora of knowledge and experience. Whereas, youth people could find a method for cancer without skill or experience. As a result, we see that for some activity having expert is greatly essential.
In addition, having a innovative mind is immensely necessary. In fact, prominent contribution would be act through creative brain. Most of the experts have archaic mind, they cannot find a new approach. For example, when there is a challenge at Construction building. It might be possible that a amateur find a simple and forthwith solution for trouble, while people who are expert might be find a complex idea for solution.
By taking this issue, we can conclude that having an innovative mind and fresh spirit for implementing great tasks is highly mandatory. Nonetheless, there is a modicum of task which require a specific science or experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hority to make significant achievement. While the others believe that having expert i...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tly essential. In addition, having a innovative mind is immensely necessary....
^
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ion building. It might be possible that a amateur find a simple and forthwith sol...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, then, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07062146893 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87054719103 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556497175141 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4451876735 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5909090909 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.59090909091 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896914608176 0.243740707755 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0283972448829 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596581131707 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622864962151 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785148225418 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.