Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
Men and women are different from each other inherently. Men on one side have been characterized by strong muscles and strength while women are believed to be physically weak since the early ages. From the beginning of time, men were supposed to go and hunt for food for the survival oftheir family while women would stay back and take care of their homes. I agree that men and women are physically suited for different tasks but this cannot be generalized.
Most men are strongly built and tall and are more suited to occupations that intrinsically require strength and power more than anything else. Lumberjacking for example is a male dominated industry because of the sheer power it takes to wield an axe. This power is usually ascribed to males far more than women. Women on the other hand have been connected to tasks that required concentration and soft, delicate hands like knitting. Men have inherently huge and rough hands and would not be able to wield the needle with conviction they would wield an axe. In everyday lives, men with their strong built and strength will be seen carrying the groceries while women with their soft and small hands would be the ones who would make something out of those groceries.
Surely these attributes of physical appearance cannot be generalised. Women have the capacity to produce strength that is tantamount to the strength that a man can generate and have taken male dominated industries by storm. It is not a new sight to see women lift larger weights than men at the gym now which is a testament to the muscular power that the women of today have. Similarly, a large number of men are not physically built like the men of the stone ages who needed to hunt to survive. Men of today are equally good at tasks which require immense concentration and and soft hands to address the intricacies of a task. Just as women have taken male dominant industries like lumberjacking, weight lifting by storm. It is not a surprising sight when a man is seen cutting vegetables at home with as much ease and beauty a women would with hose fast and soft hands.
With everyone riding the tide of feminism it wouldn't be surprising to see women be equal to men in terms of physical strength and men having to develop skills for tasks that were earlier only attributed to women. As much as I would agree that men and women have inherent physical differences, the last few years suggest that both genders are narrowing the gap on their physical incapabilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tasks but this cannot be generalized. Most men are strongly built and tall and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...make something out of those groceries. Surely these attributes of physical appe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hat the women of today have. Similarly, a large number of men are not physically built like the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...sks which require immense concentration and and soft hands to address the intricacies o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 835, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...es at home with as much ease and beauty a women would with hose fast and soft hands. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 837, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
... at home with as much ease and beauty a women would with hose fast and soft hands. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would with hose fast and soft hands. With everyone riding the tide of feminis...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...everyone riding the tide of feminism it wouldnt be surprising to see women be equal to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72706422018 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56155081718 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470183486239 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6748967709 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.473684211 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9473684211 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21052631579 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28145913834 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999481830401 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701390081096 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197810286895 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457781845139 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.