Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It goes without saying that in today's progressive and sophisticated wirld where we live, making critical judgment of work is of critical importance. In fact, our judgments about different aspects of work have a significant effect on its productivity, public acceptance and even its chance to progress and develop. With this in mind, I, personally, think that any critical judgment will be valuable if it has made by an expert rather than ordinary people, and I have some reasons on which I will elaborate in following paragraphs.
First, an expert's judgment is more reliable than that of others. It is clear that we use the term "expert" for someone who has sufficient and deep knowledge about a specific field. An expert is familiar with different aspects of a work and he/she is egligible enough to make critical judgments about that matter. Consider the government wants to implent a new economic policy in nation. A proffesional economist have knowledge about various aspects of economy, inflation, unemployment, international ecosystem and so on. As a result, he is inform enough to judge about the plan's effectivity, predict its negative and positive effects on national economy and even recommend the most practical and effective ways for implementing that policy. Therefore, his judgments are more reliable than that of an ordinary person who has superficial and even incorrect information about economy.
Second, as an expert, a person is more responsible than others to make critical judgment. To be more specific, a professional person is susceptible to his scientific and academic reputation. He knows this fact that if he make falsified judgments about any matter in his professional field, this will damage his reputation as a profession. By doing so, Unfortunately, his previous effective contributions may be underrated. Hence, an expert is responsible about all his words and this leads him to spend enough time to investigate various aspects of his judgment to make a strong assertion. On the other hand, an common person, probably, has no responsibility about his judgments, so his claims may not be as verifiable as an expert.
To make crucial judgment in some fields, however, involves using new ideas and creativity. An expert's mind may be to saturated to think beyond the borders and make novel ideas. Moreover, a professional man is so zealous about his assumptions and opinions, therefore, his judgments on work may be biased even if he knows his judge is not true. In contrast, amateur people have fresher minds which help them to be more creative and imaginative than experts, also they can think about more different aspects of the work. Furthuremore, a neophyte is not too biased to make partial judgments. so his claims will be more objective. For instance, in judging about a usefulness of a tool, an expert may just focus on technical aspect of that tool, but other people pay attention to the tool's color, appearance, size and so on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...e in following paragraphs. First, an experts judgment is more reliable than that of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 551, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'informed'.
Suggestion: informed
...ecosystem and so on. As a result, he is inform enough to judge about the plans effecti...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 584, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plans'' or 'plan's'?
Suggestion: plans'; plan's
... he is inform enough to judge about the plans effectivity, predict its negative and p...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 222, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
...putation. He knows this fact that if he make falsified judgments about any matter in...
^^^^
Line 6, column 610, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... a strong assertion. On the other hand, an common person, probably, has no respons...
^^
Line 8, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dgment in some fields, however, involves using new ideas and creativity. An exper...
^^
Line 8, column 116, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... and creativity. An experts mind may be to saturated to think beyond the borders a...
^^
Line 8, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trast, amateur people have fresher minds which help them to be more creative and ...
^^
Line 8, column 591, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...t too biased to make partial judgments. so his claims will be more objective. For ...
^^
Line 8, column 702, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...usefulness of a tool, an expert may just focus on technical aspect of that tool, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2503.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13963039014 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03248924885 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494866529774 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4380609303 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.826086957 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1739130435 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17391304348 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164901912496 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565470970195 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474532575132 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117171838418 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318965383854 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.