While some love to work on different things every day, others may prefer repeating the similar tasks all day long. Personally, I strongly agree the statement that workers satisfy with having many types of tasks than doing similar tasks during the workday. I feel this way for several reasons based on my own experience and will explore them in the following paragraphs.
The first reason is that I feel more inspired and excited when I have the chance to try something new every working day. To say it more clearly, it is very boring when I need to repeat the same process or procedure again and again. When I encounter some changes in the work, there are always brand-new things to encounter and need to be solved. Finishing these kinds of new challenges makes me feel more confident and satisfied than taking the same action.
Secondly, there will be more chances to meet new people, who usually work on tasks different from mine. In my opinion, meeting with different people is the funniest thing in the world. Even just imagining all the fabulous ideas brought from the interesting and intense brainstorming during the workday will make me scream out loudly. Not to mention that all attractive and exciting activities we can do together after the work.
Last but not the least, I can continuously improve my skill sets during the working time when I conquer different things every day. If a worker only do the same thing all day long, his ability to learn new techniques or deal with tasks other than the familiar ones may be lost. Moreover, as more tasks I can handle, I will have more choices and not feel worried or anxious if I have to change my job.
In conclusion, I feel that conducting different types of tasks is necessary for all reasons provided above. Also, I believe that this way will result in positive results to every worker who have experience on different types of tasks instead of only working on the similar tasks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74117647059 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42789441292 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8689277286 48.9658058833 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.75 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360441783186 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122194854638 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106581118994 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216745907513 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991470666571 0.0645574589148 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.