There are always some mistakes which are made by lecturers during the class. Personally, I think that it is a good way to interrupt and correct the mistake right away. I feel this way for three reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, if there is any mistake which is not be clarified immediately, it will be a big problem when someone tries to study this class or lecture hard and wants to get some correct ideas from it. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was senior high school student, there was a mistake which made by the physics teacher. This mistake were not be correct right away. Afterwards, when the concept which is related to the mistake occured in the important exam, everyone in that class got it wrong. Therefore, we can see the negative effect caused by not correcting mistake right away.
On the other hand, correcting mistakes immediately will increase interactions between lecturers and students. Since there is not frequent interactions between lecturers and students during the class, this fact afftects the ability of conversation of students. If we want to let our educational system more robust and train more high-performance students, I think it is a good way to augment the conversational skill of students. To sum up, we can implement this way by letting students correct mistakes in class right away first.
Last but not least, correting mistakes immediately will let lecturer be aware of what he said and urge himself to performance well and energetic. Sometimes, especially for those senior teachers, teachers are not performance well due to teaching routine which are ofter lack of challenge. Therefore, I think this way will help them become more enthusiastic.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is excellent and beneficial to interrupt class and correct mistakes which were made by lecturers. This is because this way will avoid big problems occuring in the future, augment conversational ability of students, and inspire teacher to perform better.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, i feel, i think, in conclusion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04970760234 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86488983899 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7205947308 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9444444444 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160323043264 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068552561088 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590203375353 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106982868953 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503833032062 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.