The reading is about beneficial effects of altruistic behavior of meerkat and human. It offers two supporting ideas in order to strengthen its claim. However, the lecturer says, they did not reveals what actually said. She refutes each of the claim.
First, the passage states that, meerkat sacrifices its food in order to guard the burrow. But, the professor denies this and she explains that, according to one study meerkat do not sacrifice food before guarding the burrow rather before working as a sentinel it satiated its stomach.
Second, the given article asserts that meerkat first escape to save the others by dinging the alarm. However, the speaker refutes to admit it. She says, meerkat not doing this altruistic behavior to protect others but to save itself from the upcoming danger.
Third, the reading claims that human often do altruistic behavior but don’t get the reward. The point is incoherent with the professor point of view. She describes by citing an example, where a donor give his or her kidney to save another human. But, often time the donor get acknowledgement as a possible reward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'reveal'
Suggestion: reveal
...owever, the lecturer says, they did not reveals what actually said. She refutes each of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 185.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05945945946 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43495364833 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0364720978 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2307692308 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1375913606 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418268729732 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542658567241 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803036294939 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574345485565 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.