Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown into a big business. Rare and important fossils are now being sold to private ownership for millions of dollars. This is an unfortunate development for both scientists and the general public.
The public suffers because fossils that would otherwise be donated to museums where everyone can see them are sold to private collectors who do not allow the public to view their collections. Making it harder for the public to see fossils can lead to a decline in public interest in fossils, which would be a pity.
More importantly, scientists are likely to lose access to some of the most important fossils and thereby miss out on potentially crucial discoveries about extinct life forms. Wealthy fossil buyers with a desire to own the rarest and most important fossils can spend virtually limitless amounts of money to acquire them. Scientists and the museums and universities they work for often cannot compete successfully for fossils against millionaire fossil buyers.
Moreover, commercial fossil collectors often destroy valuable scientific evidence associated with the fossils they unearth. Most commercial fossil collectors are untrained or uninterested in carrying out the careful field work and documentation that reveal the most about animal life in the past. For example, scientists have learned about the biology of nest-building dinosaurs called oviraptors by carefully observing the exact position of oviraptor fossils in the ground and the presence of other fossils
The given reading is on to selling rare fossil to the private firm was unacceptable for both scientist and general public. It presents three supporting reason in order to strengthen its assertion. However, the professor says, the reading claims was exaggerated and it will not delimit for greater scientist opportunity as well bigger exposure to the public. She refutes each of the reading stance.
First, the passage claims, the museum will not able to display those rare fossil. And ultimately public will be deprived to view. The lecturer denies this assertions. She explains, there would a greater chance of general people to see the fossil. This will possible when, private firm bought those fossil and they will sell these fossil to the school, library for exposure.
Second, the reading asserts scientist will lose the field to research. However, the professor refutes this position. She describes, the needs of scientist will not dwindling, rather their expertise suggestions will be rise. When private firms will buy fossil they needs to hire scientist in order to identify its core details.
Third, the passage presents there was a chance to destroy the fossil. The claims is quite incoherent with the lecturer explanations. The lecturer says, as there is not enough room for university and academic association to disinter those fossil and also they have not needful instruments for that purpose. And it also lay the chance of fossil going to be undiscovered. So, private firm will need in order to accelerate this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...was unacceptable for both scientist and general public. It presents three supporting reason in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e deprived to view. The lecturer denies this assertions. She explains, there would a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fossil' or 'those fossils'?
Suggestion: this fossil; those fossils
...will possible when, private firm bought those fossil and they will sell these fossil to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fossil' or 'these fossils'?
Suggestion: this fossil; these fossils
... bought those fossil and they will sell these fossil to the school, library for exposure. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'dwindle'
Suggestion: dwindle
...cribes, the needs of scientist will not dwindling, rather their expertise suggestions wil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eir expertise suggestions will be rise. When private firms will buy fossil they need...
^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
...When private firms will buy fossil they needs to hire scientist in order to identify ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...hance to destroy the fossil. The claims is quite incoherent with the lecturer expl...
^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fossil' or 'those fossils'?
Suggestion: this fossil; those fossils
...ty and academic association to disinter those fossil and also they have not needful instrume...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20080321285 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58726816335 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510040160643 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6062746771 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.9444444444 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8333333333 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05555555556 7.06452816374 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116469745616 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396084831212 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444168594838 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797075290887 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300819319704 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.