Life is a series of choices. To the statement that person should never make an important decision alone, I disagree. Making independent decisions is better than making dependent decisions because of two reasons that I will explore in this essay.
To begin with, independent decisions could help people think independently. This is because making decisions helps us to develop problem solving ability. Therefore, when we make verdict with the help of other people, this might interrupt our aptitude towards finding a solution in our issue. Problem solving ability comes handy when you need to advice for other people or make an important decision alone. For example, getting advice for decisions has some limits, so independent thinking is required in life.
Secondly, making dependent choices could ruin the private intention. To elaborate this; a lot of advice could disturb private intention by making people confused from the advice. Interruption in objective could make people lose enthusiasm in decision, while enthusiasm is the energy to continue social activity. For example, dreams and goals made by other people do not help to shift independent movement.
In conclusion, Important decisions should be made individually because it could increase problem solving ability and to prevent ruining of private intention.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Life is a series of choices. To the stat...
^^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dependent thinking is required in life. Secondly, making dependent choices could...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 1977.66487455 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 204.0 407.700716846 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51960784314 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.48103885553 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73038775654 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 212.727598566 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 618.680645161 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1212583016 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6153846154 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6923076923 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280401661448 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109613543332 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128706959874 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179851667273 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111739363167 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.