Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position
The prompt urges nations to suspend the funding for the arts when numerous of its citizens ae affected with hunger and unemployedness. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly agree" with the concept and hereby obliged to provide necessary elaboration of some viewpoints in defense of my position.
In the very first of the issue we have to have a clear idea ono the concept of arts. Arts in its mainstream view is the aestheticism of various contemporary or ancient things that are enlivened through the delight in people. It is related with the inner peace and beauty of an individual. However, this beauty is somewhow connected with the the mass sensitivity and priviledges. Although almost all the species on the face of earth remain happy if they meet with the their daily necessary amount of food, nevertheless, human are exception of it. They are such a wonderful creature that they want to live in a better way, with more inner satistifaction - lack in other creatures. As a means of which arts had been introduced by human, through which they share their inner beauty and satiate their feelings towards certain things. But this is not a matter of debate until and unless these aesthetic people are not devoid of their rights and fundamental necessities; foods, jobs and general livelihood. If any of the basic needs of people are compensated with the arts, then the value of those arts might not withstand the same of the ones free of any regression. However, that is a thing of dispute to cover in following parables.
The relationship between arts and the cherishers of these art are linked through the necessity of those in their (human) lives. It is obvious that we, human can not live without proper jobs, food and all our basic needs or it would be quite a hard life to lead devoid of any of the mentioned things. It would be hardly believable that a person who is devoid of his basic needs, will even think of making his or her life beautiful. It can be more intelligable through an example. Such as - a person who is starving for food for a few days will obviously prefer to eat almost nay edible foods irrespective of their (foods) values. May be foods cost a few pennies or may be the highly desired ones - no matter to the pernicious person as what matters to him the most if his hunger which is needed to be satiated as early as possible. However, does that mean the person is devoid of any sensitivites or beauties that evokes arts to cherish? May be not. Might be the case that he will signify arts once and whenever he is apt to do so; after satiating his hunger. So, it is clearly recognizable that that when the priority to be decided is between hunger, unemployment and arts - the underpriviledged people, in no matter will chose hunger to satiate rther his inner beauty to flourish. This is the main reason behind impugning the government to stop funding for arts and urging to transfer those in the field of satiating hunger and providing jobs to it citizens.
Counterintuitive of this point will be to cut of the funding from the field of arts but not to pursue it in the inderminded fields also. In this case - prevention of funding in the fields of arts is not thoght to be good intiative either as it will have no value unless the undermined fileds are not attempted to be developed. The sole resoning of this view is the same as it is mentioned earlier. People will not choose arts over hunger to satiate themselves. It will always be the physical needs that to be satisfied first and then it comes to the intellectual needs. It is because without sound health moral development is not plausible to be happened. That is why - even if a government stops its funding in arts may not prosper if the continue to ignore the hunger and umemployment of its fellow people. And only way not to do so is to - making the flow in the right direction - to invest its money and resources to satiate the hunger of its people and make them priviledged providing sufficient work and jobs. Without the second initiatives to be taken, nevertheless, how much the first one is cherished - the upshot will be fruitless.
So, looking at all the points mentioned above it will is suggestable to stop funding from the government in the field of arts, specially when the nation is facing difficulties with hunger and unemployment. Similarly it is also encouraged to invest necessarily to decrease the hunger of the people as both of these are parallel.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... this beauty is somewhow connected with the the mass sensitivity and priviledges. Altho...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... this beauty is somewhow connected with the the mass sensitivity and priviledges. Altho...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...of earth remain happy if they meet with the their daily necessary amount of food, neverth...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...uld be quite a hard life to lead devoid of any of the mentioned things. It would be hardl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nk of making his or her life beautiful. It can be more intelligable through an exa...
^^
Line 5, column 1087, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... hunger. So, it is clearly recognizable that that when the priority to be decided is betw...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1219, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'choose'
Suggestion: choose
...erpriviledged people, in no matter will chose hunger to satiate rther his inner beaut...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1371, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'transferring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: transferring
...ent to stop funding for arts and urging to transfer those in the field of satiating hunger ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... to pursue it in the inderminded fields also. In this case - prevention of funding i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 737, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its funding in arts may not prosper if the continue to ignore the hunger and umemployment o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ficulties with hunger and unemployment. Similarly it is also encouraged to invest necessa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 52.0 19.5258426966 266% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 33.0505617978 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 119.0 58.6224719101 203% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3690.0 2235.4752809 165% => OK
No of words: 791.0 442.535393258 179% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66498103666 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.30327466957 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72101888086 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 346.0 215.323595506 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437420986094 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1146.6 704.065955056 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.110535259 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.529411765 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2647058824 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70588235294 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144997966922 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384889663339 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471946935231 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100211129804 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459614577434 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 100.480337079 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... this beauty is somewhow connected with the the mass sensitivity and priviledges. Altho...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... this beauty is somewhow connected with the the mass sensitivity and priviledges. Altho...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...of earth remain happy if they meet with the their daily necessary amount of food, neverth...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...uld be quite a hard life to lead devoid of any of the mentioned things. It would be hardl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nk of making his or her life beautiful. It can be more intelligable through an exa...
^^
Line 5, column 1087, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... hunger. So, it is clearly recognizable that that when the priority to be decided is betw...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1219, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'choose'
Suggestion: choose
...erpriviledged people, in no matter will chose hunger to satiate rther his inner beaut...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1371, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'transferring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: transferring
...ent to stop funding for arts and urging to transfer those in the field of satiating hunger ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... to pursue it in the inderminded fields also. In this case - prevention of funding i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 737, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its funding in arts may not prosper if the continue to ignore the hunger and umemployment o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ficulties with hunger and unemployment. Similarly it is also encouraged to invest necessa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 52.0 19.5258426966 266% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 33.0505617978 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 119.0 58.6224719101 203% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3690.0 2235.4752809 165% => OK
No of words: 791.0 442.535393258 179% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66498103666 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.30327466957 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72101888086 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 346.0 215.323595506 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437420986094 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1146.6 704.065955056 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.110535259 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.529411765 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2647058824 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70588235294 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144997966922 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384889663339 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471946935231 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100211129804 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459614577434 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 100.480337079 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.