Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?
Food is the basic need of every animal. However, many foods are not produced locally due to the environmental factors and lack of required ecosystem. Therefore, as a practice foods will transport long away to there market. By the way, Some people think, use of local food is much more good for the environment and economically than use of shipped products.
Use of local foods are more nutrition rich as no use of chemicals and long run transportation, which creates considerable waste. Furthermore, most of the shipped foods are packed on plastic based or matalic based packaging, which is not good at all to release to the environment as directly impact on environment pollution. In addition, most of the local food are processed not only chemically free in transportation but also in the production stage, which gives organic products to the home. Therefore, use of local food is good for both environment and health.
Considering the food industry, the varieties of foods expands on large spectrum due to the geographical, cultural and economical reasons on each area. Moreover, due to unbalance on supply and demand curves, foods need to be shipped from place to place. In addition, impossibility of local food production, which requires special ecosystems, need to be transport from excess market, where produce the items in mass scale providing lower cost due to the economic of scale. Therefore, use of some shipped foods gain more economical benefits than local foods.
Even though people think on eating local food I more environmentally and economically, it is depends on the area leaved and the availability of the food. Therefore, food discipline is required when searching th foods by considering the eco-friendliness and the own economic condition. There are both advantages and disadvantages on use of local food if not properly understand the requirement of usage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...m due to the geographical, cultural and economical reasons on each area. Moreover, due to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...re, use of some shipped foods gain more economical benefits than local foods. Even tho...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20655737705 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08094506943 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52131147541 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5409735848 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408918918627 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156502090273 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830993724878 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28298787115 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958549178971 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.