Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
“Problems are meant to be solved but; ‘when’ is a crucial part”. And same is expected by the government to do for their people who rely on them. Each day number of problems are faced in several aspects, which has different outcomes; either positive impact or negative impact, the impact may be for short term or long term. So solving problem today instead of trying to solve in future is what suggested. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the suggestion & argue that problems are need to be addressed today for 2 main reason.
In Hindi once a famous author said that “Kal kare so aaj kar, aaj kare so ab” meaning: The work which has been left to do tomorrow has to be completed today, and the work which is to be done today must be done now. For instance, pot hole problems of the roads are to be addressed on the priority. This is because firstly it creates unnecessary traffic on the road due to the bad condition of the road and vehicles unable to move faster. This again give roots to several different problems. Secondly, the risk factor increases with the improper condition of the roads which leads to the number of increasing accidents. So, if these issues are solved then and there, then citizens can live with more efficiency and comfort. Also it would not lead to other problem such as long waiting in the traffic. Since “time is money” it is important we save it and do optimum utilization of the same. We know that there are number of things to do each day and the yesterday’s work definetly gets pile up with today’s.
Further, Solving problem in time create a sense of respect for the government as people know their problems are taken into consideration. Results of issues left to solve in the future has its own negative impacts. In 2014, the Nirbhaya case in Delhi took all the attraction due to the inhuman move of 6 culprits against a single women. She was brutally raped and left to die. This case was so sensitive that it brought men, women and children from across the country to protest against the culprits. The women died in 5 days. Culprits of this case were sentenced to death by hang but unfortunately it was done after 8 years. 8 years is a long period of time to get a justice for one who died in 5 days. If immediate action and necessary punishment was given then it would have create a sense of fear in people’s eye, that if anyone does such kind of action will be punished severly. In the other hand, delay in such incidents results in a negative way as people’s hope is on stake in such situations.
Saving the problem for the future is no good as firstly it will ruin the today and who knows about the future what it will bring to us. It is highly suggested that the problems are to be addressed on time rather than leave it in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
“Problems are meant to be solved but; ‘w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be addressed today for 2 main reason. In Hindi once a famous author said that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 477, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...o move faster. This again give roots to several different problems. Secondly, the risk factor inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 737, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... live with more efficiency and comfort. Also it would not lead to other problem such...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... definetly gets pile up with today’s. Further, Solving problem in time create ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...man move of 6 culprits against a single women. She was brutally raped and left to die...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s done after 8 years. 8 years is a long period of time to get a justice for one who died in 5 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...punishment was given then it would have create a sense of fear in people’s eye, that i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 950, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r hand, delay in such incidents results in a negative way as people’s hope is on stake in such si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hope is on stake in such situations. Saving the problem for the future is no ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48046875 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44840050342 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505859375 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8888925083 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2307692308 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221107883191 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590769526336 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688035431815 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1482916356 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608796583123 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.1639044944 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.