It is critically important for governments that realize where to invest their budgets. This is a controversial issue among nations that spend their capital in the right places. As far as I am concerned, countries had better dedicate their money to improve public transportation because this brings more benefit for them. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, promoting public transportation help to lower air pollution in the country, which can significantly affect social health. There is no doubt that if people can utilize the metro, bus, and other common vehicles easily, they would not like to use their personal cars. These numerous personal cars, which certainly one person is in it, produce much more CO2 and CO in the air. On the other hand, Most of the public vehicles work by electricity, which means they don’t have a bad effect on the air. Take my county for instance, our government don’t care about public transportation consequently, subways and buses are too old and obsolete. As a result, I don’t desire to use them, so I have to use my own car to commute every day. Imagine every people use their car every day. In this case, the atmosphere of our city would be so dirty that we could not inhale safely. In contrast, the metro, which uses electricity could help people to have a healthy life.
Secondly, improving the common vehicles can contribute to diminishing the expense of fuel consumption, which helps governments save money and invest their budget on another issue. Undoubtedly, public buses consume less fuel than personal cars. Also, the metro, as I mentioned in the previous paragraph, uses electricity, thus the expense of fuel would be cut down by using these vehicles. In this regard, the government can use this saving money to invest in advanced technology such as electrical cars. For instance, ten years ago, Germany tried to improve its transportation to reduce its costs of fuel. After that, the government could allocate more money for research on electrical cars. Thanks to the result of the research, Germany now profits from that, and you see many electrical cars in the country. By this decision, the country could be one of the most advanced nations in the world.
In conclusion, I believe that government should spend more money to promote public transportation than internet access. This is because developing common vehicles brings about lower air pollution that influences social health and helps government invest in advanced research such as electrical cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 897, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the most advanced nations in the world. In conclusion, I believe that government...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anced research such as electrical cars.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03271028037 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72231857606 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504672897196 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3008852781 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.652173913 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6086956522 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4347826087 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224718209359 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684589933185 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663119218636 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154064972754 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352653722736 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.