After doing a presentation, you want to identify your weaknesses and improve your skills. Which of the following ways do you think is better?
1.Review your recording alone
2.Let classmates or colleagues give suggestions and discuss about them.
There are certain different ways to improve the performance after doing a presentation. Some people claim that it is efficient to review recordings alone to find problems during the presentation. However, I could hardly agree more with the statement that it could be more helpful for presenters that allowing others to offer their suggestions and discuss about given advice together. The fundamental and deeper discussions are illustrated as follows.
Discussing suggestions for presenting and figuring out the best solutions to problems with others could make people more motivated. For one thing, watching recordings alone could be a boring thing and people might easily get distracted by other irrelevant things. Instead, it is more efficient to discuss with others and listen to their advice since it can supervise people to focus on this certain issue. For another, it is much easier to insist reviewing performance with the companion of others since people could not only point out our weaknesses, but also affirm our advantages. By contrast, if we review recordings on my own, we might feel disappointed since we find various disadvantages of our presentation. Therefore, it is better to listen to suggestions from others and discuss them for the improvement of presentation since it is high efficiency.
Additionally, others' opinions are generally more objectives since different people have different thoughts and perspectives. It is more easily for other listens to find limits in our delivery. When we review our own records, it is common that we neglect some weaknesses or we fail to define certain problems. Others could help us by pointing out this kind of problems and help us improve our skills. For instance, people might not regard some misunderstanding expressions as problems when they talk because they believe that they explain everything clearly and all the audience should understand what they are talking about. However, it could be hard to understand for others since everyone has own modes of thinking, they might consider your explanation for a certain definition is not logical which causes difficulty in understanding of your topic. Then some specific suggestions can be given and the presenter and listeners could discuss together which is the best way to improve the performance.
To sum up, we may safely conclude that discussing with others is a comparatively better way to identify problems and enhance skills after presentations. This is because it can help motivate people to review problems and more objects suggestions could be proposed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 860, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esentation since it is high efficiency. Additionally, others opinions are genera...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r instance, people might not regard some misunderstanding expressions as problems...
^^
Line 9, column 1002, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he best way to improve the performance. To sum up, we may safely conclude that d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for instance, kind of, talking about, for one thing, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36029411765 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96924110398 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482843137255 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0685690846 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.105263158 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153597775002 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581859388989 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522163825404 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113388494008 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319723885617 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.