There are undoubtedly many reasons why people play sports. Some people may claim that the main causes are health and entertainment. However, I could hardly agree more that sports can actually serve as powerful lessons as I now involve myself in it often enough.
One important life lesson I learned from sport games is that it is not always better to win. Normally, people take winning in a competition as something worth celebrating, but my experiences of playing sports with friends and families let me know that what matters most when playing games with them is to have a good time together. Taking winning too seriously could lead to negative impacts on our relationships since we might consider others as competitors and loath them which possibly hurts their feelings. Sometimes, we even need to deliberately lose the game in order to cheer others up, which could be a good way to establish better relationships . A person who is addicted to the feeling of being superior all the time is unlikely to have anyone close to him or her. Having a good experience in playing is much more important for most of people.
Another important principle I figured out by playing sports is that if we want to be trusted, we need to have faith in others first. We all have seen people complaining that they are not given the opportunities to do something they can, and a lot of them tend to blame it on the jealousy of others, but when I played basketball with some strangers on the court, I realized if I chose to believe that a person could score and thus him the ball, the person would also willing to count on me when I had the chance. Simply put, people treat us the way we treat them. When you are unselfish on the basketball court, you can cooperate with your teammates to score and win.
To sum up, from what we have discussed above, one of the greatest things about life is that there are lessons to be taken everywhere. If we keep that in mind, then we will realize that we are making discoveries even when we do not intend to do so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...od way to establish better relationships . A person who is addicted to the feeling...
^^
Line 3, column 839, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...e in playing is much more important for most of people. Another important principle I figur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54891304348 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54937364242 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.8538665313 48.9658058833 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155129299705 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547264133748 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423799725541 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903473752965 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187934196129 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.