These days, overweight has been considered one of the pressing problems. Increasing the price of food containing too much fat should be the solution to this problem. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this measure to some extent.
To begin with, one of the primary reasons why many people have trouble keeping fit is the lack of physical exercises. Because of prices escalation, individuals have to work harder for a better life by spending extra hours at their workplace regularly, resulting in a shortage of time. Therefore, they tend to get tired after a busy day and desire to relax rather than engage in any physical activities to keep fit. Moreover, the second reason is the affordability of junk food. It is not uncommon recently that a great number of people prefer choosing fast food, which offers adequate calories at low prices.
However, I believe that the increase in price of fattening food should not solve the problem of overweight. Because of the lack of time, people do not mind taking part in either sports or physical activities which can lead to overweight. As a result, the governments should not only enact laws that limit the amount of time used for work but also allocate resources to the establishment of greenery sites that might encourage their citizens to do exercise. The Vietnamese authorities, for instance, have been investing hundreds of millions of dollars for the replenishment of embarkments across the country. This has led to countless people jogging every day.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that growing the price of fat food holds no value in dealing with overweight nowadays because the main reason is the lack of time. In the future, governments should impose regulations preventing their citizens from working too much.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
... great number of people prefer choosing fast food, which offers adequate calories at...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03754266212 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.753164283 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617747440273 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5535940601 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20573589117 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685020091089 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594074670105 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122465184215 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554986484881 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.