Do you agree or disagree with the following statement the only effective way for the government to encourage energy conservation is to increase the price of gasoline and electricity | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement the only effective way for the government to encourage energy conservation is to increase the price of gasoline and electricity

Beyond a shadow of a doubt, in the last few decades, with the increasing usage of gasoline and electricity, it triggers the green house effect and withnin a few decades, it would be impossible for human to live on the earth. On that ground, the government has been taking some serious steps in order to mitigate the negative consequences. In this regard, a plethora of people possess the conviction that increasing price of gasoline and electicity would demotivate people to use such resources. On the other side, another group of people take is as an exaggeration and apparently, think in an opposite manner. Certainly, from my vantage point, the former point contains more weight. For the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my stance.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that increasing price of fuel and electricity would not make much difference in the future. To be more specific, with the rising of economy level in last few years, people are earning a quite good salary that help them to utilise more money on such resources even though the price will shoot up. On the contrary, it will badly affect to those people who do not earn much but dependency on electricity and gasoline is basic necessity in their family as other ordinary people. To shed more light on this, my contry’s example is utterly a compelling exaample of what has been elaborated above. While ago, the state government in my state suddenly escalated the price of fluel at one night in order to reduce the usage of it in the future days. The result was quite shocking. The richer people continued using those automobiles and other commodies, however, poor families affected badly since they could not afford to utilise such resources with high price. Fortunately, the government realised it mistake and lower down the price of gasoline with in few months. Ultimately, it is judicious to say that lowering the price of gasoline or electricy would not create much different while considering the whole scenario.

Another noteworthy reason striking in my mind is that irrefutably, there are other solid ways whereby the government effectively force people to cut down the usage of resources. In other words, in the current era, due to development of science and technology, many countries comes up with the idea of solar energy which could lead to abrupt change in the current scenario. In fact, solar energy can be used in oder to drive vehicles and peopledo not electricty since solar energy can replace electricity quite easily. On top of that, this new model would not affect the poor families. To exemplify, a data statestic collected from a empirical study that is conducted from the University of California indicates that in lasy year, China has able to saved 60% of gasoline and 67% of electricity by enforcing people to start depending on solar energy. Admittedly, this enforces me to posit that other countries would probably save their energy usege if they impliment solar plan in the next few years.

To recapitualate, from contemplating all remarks, in spite of teh fact that some may not agree with my viewpoint, I explicity believe that the government should not rise price of gasoline and electricity to reduce the consumption. This is because poor families might have to suffere widely and rich families would showcase the same usage like earlier. Additionally, there are other cost effective ways such as start using soalr energy could the best replacemenf of gasoline and electricity.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 588, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an opposite manner" with adverb for "opposite"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s an exaggeration and apparently, think in an opposite manner. Certainly, from my vantage point, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1040, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mistakes'?
Suggestion: mistakes
...Fortunately, the government realised it mistake and lower down the price of gasoline wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...lopment of science and technology, many countries comes up with the idea of solar energy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mplify, a data statestic collected from a empirical study that is conducted from ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, in fact, such as, in other words, in spite of, on the contrary, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 95.0 52.1666666667 182% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2970.0 1977.66487455 150% => OK
No of words: 591.0 407.700716846 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02538071066 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93056706295 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72638245035 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 212.727598566 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514382402707 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 974.7 618.680645161 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 4.94265232975 384% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1691319961 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45833333333 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234679495553 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609553006003 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498020793497 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147330416827 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259655575612 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.