The inequality between the thriving and poor countries is wider and wider than it used to be. In this essay, I intend to figure out the causes and suggest some possible solutions to that problem.
First, the inequality results from the priority of investors and employers. Prosperous nations are prone to have better education system and more developed factories, so people coming from these countries are believed to be more skillful and more conscientious as well. Therefore, employers have a tendency to choose candidates from these nations. Moreover, several businessmen decide to invest into the richer nations other the poor ones because they might think that the higher standard living they are, the lucrative they become. To resolve that problem, I think both the goverments and the dwellers have to take measures. Government of a developing country should increase people’s income to raise the living standard and the education systems. Inhabitants in those countries had better improve their skills and knowledge.
Secondly, another factor contributing to the inequality is the priority of global organisations. Because developed countries have not only money but also power, so it is vital that the global instituitions try to maintain a harmonious relationship to help them be supported. Moreover, the poorer ones do not take solving environmental problems in consideration, which lead to global warming in all over the world. To tackle that issue, people should have long term approach like reducing the use of fossil fuels, planting more trees and so on.
In conclusion, this problem is unlikely to be addressed immediately. However, if people understand the causes, they will know how to solve the issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from these countries are believed to be more skillful and more conscientious as ...
^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...kle that issue, people should have long term approach like reducing the use of fossi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37132352941 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86020669381 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606617647059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9205191669 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132342683081 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436724825069 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537790970657 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891649970395 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060100274348 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.