TPO 20 Integrated
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the damages of "let it burn" policy which asks to replace it with less harmful policy. Because "let it burn" policy was blamed most of the Yellowstone national park destroyed in a massive fire of 1988.
First, the professor states that after Yellowstone fire, many plant species had opportunity to grow despite the time that they couldn't compete with other species. For instance, some seeds started to germinate after fire as well as some other species of trees and a new kind of vegetation became appeared in Yellowstone park.
Second, it is mentioned in the reading passage that the Yellowstone's wildlife could be seriously affected by such large fire. Although deer and elks could able to runaway from fire, there were many other small species of animals that couldn't escape. Also, many of animals have lost their habitats and food resources, thus, if they could able to runaway from fire, they would die due to lack of food. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this idea, and states that other animal have opportunity to live in new habitat. For instance, new vegetation triggers Rabbits and Hales to choose this area as their habitat, therefore, they would be hunted by predators and food chain cycle starts again. Hence, this idea has been repudiated by the professor either.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that fires on Yellowstone would have negative impact on tourism industry which is beneficial to local economy and business. On the contrary, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that Yellowstone's fire on 1988 was result of drought, uncommon weather change and it did not happened every year. Also, after fire, more tourists have visited the park with increase pace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...nity to grow despite the time that they couldnt compete with other species. For instanc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...any other small species of animals that couldnt escape. Also, many of animals have lost...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
... uncommon weather change and it did not happened every year. Also, after fire, more tour...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for instance, kind of, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15771812081 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48004740006 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8906827801 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.230769231 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354758520956 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125303933979 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640518423517 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205922022462 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01242653417 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.