How government distribute their financial support to the people has always been a major issue to consider, while I believe that governments should ensure that their major cities have the financial support they need, I disagree that one nation’s cultural traditions are primarily preserved and generated in cities. Although major cities do contribute to generating new culture and trends, I believe it is the rural area that serves the role of preserving culture and traditions.
Most of the major cities have some common characteristics that make them suitable for generating new culture. Major cities usually possess an abundance of resource, provide an innovative environment, and encourage competition. Such characteristics helps people in major cities to generate more income, create more mind-blowing ideas, and better identify the monetary value of things when compared to people in the rural area. The pressure of innovation makes city dwellers adept in creating new cultures, cultures that are often fast paced and keen on money-making ideas.
Although it is true that major cities may create some of the more influencing trends such as the popular culture, and may help preserve a few valuable traditions of a society, I believe it is wrong to ascribe the preserving of a nation’s cultural traditions primarily to cities. The culture generated in the fast paced, ever changing community is more like a trend rather than a long lasting tradition. What you see popular in the cities nowadays may soon become obsolete in the upcoming years. To preserve the existing tradition and generate long-lasting cultures, I believe the key is in sustaining the rural area’s vitality.
Rural area and major cities are in some way fundamentally different, but they are equally important in the development of cultures and traditions of a nation. The slow paced, slow changing style of the rural area makes it perfect for preserving traditions. The rural area is also good at filtering out unnecessary trends we often see in the cities, thus only keeping the ones that are able to last. When the nation’s rural area is well developed, it serves as a strong base in which the traditions are maintained, new culture can be formed without having to worry that the old lessons are forgotten. A well maintained rural area can even act as a shelter when the city dwellers feel lost in the fast changing environment. In a world that is changing faster than ever, I believe rural areas are more important than major cities concerning the preservance and generation of a nation’s cultural tradition.
Major cities should receive sufficient financial support from the government in order to prosper, and it is no doubt that governments who would like their nation to thrive must put considerable effort to make sure their major cities has enough resources to develop. The government, however, should not ignore the importance of maintaining a well-developed rural area, for the rural area can serve as a base where new cultures are created, and a refuge when the city dwellers find themselves lost in the fast paced world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'help'.
Suggestion: help
...urage competition. Such characteristics helps people in major cities to generate more...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...it is true that major cities may create some of the more influencing trends such as the pop...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, no doubt, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2641.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2090729783 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91792714614 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463510848126 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 847.8 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.0048866504 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.722222222 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350515203916 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121006479515 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10784274206 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226939692105 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969462753329 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.