The author is trying to establish a connection between the number of people who attend the Super Screen-produced movies and the need to increase budget of advertising. She is telling that since the number of people who attend Super Screen-produced movies is reduced despite positive reviews of movies so, the Super Screen should invest more money in advertising. However, the argument lacks evidence and a few questions need to be answered in order to make the argument more warranted.
First, the author mentions that the percentage of positive reviews has increased for a specific movie but she has failed to mention anything about the number of reviewers who have reviewed a movie. Moreover, there is a possibility that people who have liked the movie have not reviewed the movie.
Second, the author has mentioned that public is not aware about the good quality movie but there could be possibility that people are already aware of such movies and they are busy and can not watch such movies. There could also be a possibility that the Super Screen-produced movies that are bad and many people did not watch these movies because their friends or relatives have told them that a movie is not good.
Third, the author tells that Super Screen should allocate more budget next year in advertising. However, there is no guarantee that allocationg budget would woo more public.
In a nutshell, it can be said on the basis of the above-mentioned lack of adequate evidence that some answers need to be provided by the author. Therefore, the argument lacks cogency and is untenable.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.263157894737 0.25644967241 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.182456140351 0.15541462614 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0842105263158 0.0836205057962 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0456140350877 0.0520304965353 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0210526315789 0.0272364105082 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108771929825 0.125424944231 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0385964912281 0.0416121511921 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7105899673 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0210526315789 0.026700313972 79% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.112280701754 0.113004496875 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0245614035088 0.0255425247493 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0210526315789 0.0127820249294 165% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1587.0 2731.13054187 58% => OK
No of words: 265.0 446.07635468 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98867924528 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.57801047555 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362264150943 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230188679245 0.287650121315 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166037735849 0.208842608468 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0943396226415 0.135150697306 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7105899673 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 207.018472906 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471698113208 0.469332199767 101% => OK
Word variations: 44.164084465 52.1807786196 85% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.039408867 55% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0909090909 23.2022227129 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2395180387 57.7814097925 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.272727273 141.986410481 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 23.2022227129 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 0.724660767414 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.58251231527 0% => OK
Readability: 47.1097770154 51.9672348444 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.64788732394 1.8405768891 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365864722104 0.441005458295 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.195368117515 0.135418324435 144% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.153910406582 0.0829849096947 185% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.729411866278 0.58762219726 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137683521648 0.147661913831 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170769309224 0.193483328276 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089612611824 0.0970749176394 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.243629834453 0.42659136922 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0917316194574 0.0774707102158 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213977801196 0.312017818177 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777085948788 0.0698173142475 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.33743842365 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.82512315271 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 14.657635468 75% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.