In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patrol, many drivers are exceeding the speed limit. Prunty County should instead undertake the same kind of road improvement project that Butler County completed five years ago: increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. Today, major Butler County roads still have a 55 mph speed limit, yet there were 25 percent fewer reported accidents in Butler County this past year than there were five years ago.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Prunty county faces a big problem related to vehicle accidents. Hence, higher authority passes a law relevant to speed limits. But, this legal system fails to curb the accidents. Also, highway patrol cops provide a report and claims that many drivers still miscreant the limited speed. Hence, top council decide to employ same mechanism that applied by Butler county in last 5 years. In that Butler county officials decided to improve road quality and visibility. Therefore, same scenario will apply to Prunty county then situation will be ameliorated. Stated in this way the arguments fail to mention several points based on that it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on an assumption for which, there are no clear evidence. Hence, the author's conclusion unsubstantiated and unsupported.
Firstly, the argument clearly assumes that hampering the speed of the vehicles reduce the accidents. This is merely an assumption without solid background. It might be possible the cause of the accident is other reason. Like most drivers might be imbibe the alcohol significantly. Also, there may be problem of the environment. Due to higher rain mostly accidents cases happened in the world. Therefore, mention in this way argument fail to mention critical points; so, author claim is not well built as it described.
Secondly, Cops report has no any statistics about whole scenario. In addition, they claim that many driver still trespass the speed limit. But, how many drivers? It might be possible those driver are excellent in driving and they did not contributed their part in escalates accident frequency. Hence, this is again weak and unsupported argument. The argument fails to describe the relation between speed limits and the accident frequency based on veteran or good drivers.
Lastly, the argument readily assumes that one strategy had applied in other county provide surity about this county as well. It might be possible road system of the Butler county were not good as required; that's why more accident happened. so, they reduced accident by improving road quality and visibility. Again, we don't know the particular number of accidents in Butler county. It might be possible there were only 20 accident happened and they would restricted up to 15 in next five years. Hence, the argument is not compelling as it describe; therefore, author's claim is not plausible.
To conclude, the author's argument unpersuasive as it stands. To bolster it, author must provide more concrete evidence. It could be considerably strengthened if author mention all critical points. As a result the author's argument has a no legs to stands.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 32 15
No. of Words: 425 350
No. of Characters: 2155 1500
No. of Different Words: 212 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.54 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.071 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.58 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 173 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 124 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 13.281 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.41 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.562 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.243 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.418 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.048 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Please, help me in this.
Please, help me in this. Where I did a mistake ?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 745, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...there are no clear evidence. Hence, the authors conclusion unsubstantiated and unsuppor...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 27, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...scribed. Secondly, Cops report has no any statistics about whole scenario. In...
^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun driver seems to be countable; consider using: 'many drivers'.
Suggestion: many drivers
... scenario. In addition, they claim that many driver still trespass the speed limit. But, ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this driver' or 'those drivers'?
Suggestion: this driver; those drivers
... how many drivers? It might be possible those driver are excellent in driving and they did n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 239, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'contribute'
Suggestion: contribute
...e excellent in driving and they did not contributed their part in escalates accident freque...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 207, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...utler county were not good as required; thats why more accident happened. so, they re...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ired; thats why more accident happened. so, they reduced accident by improving roa...
^^
Line 13, column 319, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... road quality and visibility. Again, we dont know the particular number of accidents...
^^^^
Line 13, column 455, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'restrict'
Suggestion: restrict
...nly 20 accident happened and they would restricted up to 15 in next five years. Hence, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 539, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'describes'?
Suggestion: describes
...e, the argument is not compelling as it describe; therefore, authors claim is not plausi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...is not plausible. To conclude, the authors argument unpersuasive as it stands. To ...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... if author mention all critical points. As a result the authors argument has a no ...
^^
Line 17, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...on all critical points. As a result the authors argument has a no legs to stands.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 424.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2641509434 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68193460564 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 204.123752495 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516509433962 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 705.55239521 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 19.7664670659 167% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.8473053892 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6447223759 57.8364921388 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.6363636364 119.503703932 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8484848485 23.324526521 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.84848484848 5.70786347227 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 22.0 6.88822355289 319% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178325118355 0.218282227539 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434021370034 0.0743258471296 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357300842348 0.0701772020484 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981292879218 0.128457276422 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556162635166 0.0628817314937 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.3799401198 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.197005988 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.34 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 98.500998004 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 12.3882235529 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.1389221557 61% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.