The city council of Town X concludes that by switching all the lights in public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light-emitting diodes leads to saving money on electrical costs and claimed that LED lights burn brighter than Incandescent. At first glance, It may seem plausible, but there are several unwarranted assumptions and flaws. Before, switching to plan city council of Town X, three questions must be answered.
Firstly, The author claims that LED lights burn brighter than bulbs, It may burn more units which leads to more current costs. LED lights that burn brighter than normal consume high current. If it so, then-current bill rapidly increases instead of paying some 'P' amount we have to pay more than '2P'. then how an author can conclude that by using more brighter it reduces cost. The council should provide a proper explanation for the question.
Secondly, Even though LED lights are cheap may be the maintenance cost is huge?. To switch all the lights in public holdings, one has to remove previous bulbs and replace ew lights it may cost more and huge. Without observing and estimating all the external costs the council shouldn't propose this plan.
Finally, will LED lights have more life expectancy than incandescent bulbs?. The council fails to provide whether LED's have more life expectancy than previous bulbs. If new LED lights work only for one year then every year the government should replace it with new LED lights which lead to more cost.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is considerably flawed due to its reliance on several unwarranted assumptions. If the author is able to answer the three questions and provide more evidence(perhaps in the form of a systematic research study), then it will possible to evaluate the efficacy of the city council’s proposal to save money on electrical costs.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 307 350
No. of Characters: 1500 1500
No. of Different Words: 160 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.186 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.886 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.63 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 107 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.467 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.845 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.38 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.629 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.119 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...e P amount we have to pay more than 2P. then how an author can conclude that by usin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'brighter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: brighter
...ow an author can conclude that by using more brighter it reduces cost. The council should pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a proper explanation for the question. Secondly, Even though LED lights are che...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ting all the external costs the council shouldnt propose this plan. Finally, will LED...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: Lead
...dnt propose this plan. Finally, will LED lights have more life expectancy than i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.6327345309 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 306.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08496732026 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72478478669 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4986857315 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359276571469 0.218282227539 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119458456126 0.0743258471296 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133240262699 0.0701772020484 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21323824121 0.128457276422 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151265983015 0.0628817314937 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 98.500998004 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.