At first glance, the authors argument appeals to be convincing, but further reflection reveals that it is rife with hole and assumption about clay pots not being original piece of karians.
To begin with, the "of late" phrase does not give any evidence or proof of when did the archaelogists discovered a Karian pot in Toga. It is not plausible to think or doubt on the originality of Karian's work just beacuse of some absurd analogy of time.
In addition to that, author states about depthness and wideness of river with no plausible evidence of what was the depth of river back then, it is highly possible that in past Mist river was not as wide as it is now or even it was shallow and people could have been easily travelled from Karia to Toga.
Furthermore, author states that "Karian" pot was discovered in Toga and because of the people's inablity to travel across the river, it is not possible that the pot found was Karian's piece. But what if it was sold to the people of Toga. It is highly possible that people who lived in Karia used to sold pots for their living and daily expenses.
Finally, author assumes that it is not possible that people would have migrated and settled in Toga village. It is so obvious to think that people from Karia village could have lived there for work, education or say business. Toga people may love Karian pots and there must be high demand of these pots, so people of Karian village shifted to Toga and worked there and get a good income selling Karian pots.
To sum up, this argument is full of assumptions and it depends on superficial facts with no specific evidences and plausible explanations about the pots not being original work of Karians and states it "so-called" Karian pots.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 309 350
No. of Characters: 1391 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.193 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.502 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.31 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 90 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 59 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.454 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.406 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.708 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.11 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
At first glance, the authors argument appeals to be convincing, but ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 309.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7572815534 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63980088577 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501618122977 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3711311172 57.8364921388 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.636363636 119.503703932 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0909090909 23.324526521 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.70786347227 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225596274371 0.218282227539 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915885171774 0.0743258471296 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503454716153 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110125183771 0.128457276422 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587380658476 0.0628817314937 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.3550499002 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 98.500998004 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.