In an effort to bring new jobs to Dillton and stimulate the city 039 s flagging economy Dillton 039 s city council voted last year to lower the city 039 s corporate tax rate by 15 percent at the same time the city began offering generous relocation

In the provided argument , Dillton city tried to implement two schemes - reduced corporate tax and relocation grants to attract more factories into Dillton. However the situation hasn't taken any positive toll and the unemployment rate still remains the same . According to authors assumption this might be due to the fact that the newly employed factory members reside outside the town and could have been shifted here after their employment into the city.
This could be a fit conclusion for the situation, the author has considered the fact even after introducing almost 1000 new job opportunities if there are no improvements in the poor employment rate. It could surely be one of major reason but we need to understand that employment rate in any surrounding is a dynamic factor. factors affecting it keep on changing.
One possible example of this could be within the period of establishment of companies and recruitment process, many new people were added into the list of unemployed people - neutralizing the effect. Second considerable fact could be the quality of man power provided by the town to these companies. If the residents of the town lack on experience or technical requirements needed for the job. There is no mention of the fact that after these companies were located in Dillton, it hadn't had any adverse effect on local businesses. increase in number of retired citizens and children could also be one of the reason.
One solution to this languid economy and unemployment could be: Legal agreement with respective companies or factories regarding fixed recruitment percentage for local residents. Concession for companies with greater native employs. Training campaigns for soft skills or technical requirements for upcoming companies employability criteria. Supporting local entrepreneurs and existing businesses.
To sum it up the author has a reasonable approach to the situation and an agreeable conclusion but there are some aspects to the situation which he/she could have not considered.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
In the provided argument , Dillton city tried to implement two sch...
^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...to attract more factories into Dillton. However the situation hasnt taken any positive ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ies into Dillton. However the situation hasnt taken any positive toll and the unemplo...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...unemployment rate still remains the same . According to authors assumption this mi...
^^
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Factors
...in any surrounding is a dynamic factor. factors affecting it keep on changing. One po...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keeps'?
Suggestion: keeps
... a dynamic factor. factors affecting it keep on changing. One possible example of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...e companies were located in Dillton, it hadnt had any adverse effect on local busines...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Increase
...any adverse effect on local businesses. increase in number of retired citizens and child...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
... or technical requirements for upcoming companies employability criteria. Supporting lo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oming companies employability criteria. Supporting local entrepreneurs and exist...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, second, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 318.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34591194969 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96308447463 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594339622642 0.468620217663 127% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7847930279 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.70786347227 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0806166033884 0.218282227539 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264012681672 0.0743258471296 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504921707506 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0453458013906 0.128457276422 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455376237122 0.0628817314937 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 98.500998004 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1668 1500
No. of Different Words: 183 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.196 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.913 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 121 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.929 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.131 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.329 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.329 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.089 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5