“Regulators and policymakers should respond to potential environmental threats even before the information is fully known or concrete.”
How would you rate the accuracy of the above statement? Support your position with reasons and examples.
The given prompt suggests that - the regulators and policymakers, based on unsure possibilities of future environmental threat, should start implementing solutions immediately as soon as it's existence is known. I agree with the speaker here.
'Prevention is better than cure' is the most apt explanation for this. It is always better to be safe than sorry. A potential environmental threat could posses greater threats than the work needed to prevent it. In general, every natural imbalance was just a theory at beginning, the ignorance towards the subject has resulted it to either be unpreventable or a major existential crisis.
The second most important point here would be - it takes a lot of effort to reverse an imbalance than the effort needed to prevent it at first. An example of this could be the integrity of 'non-decomposable' plastic in human lives. If in few years after it's invention, people would have raised awareness regarding the ill-effects it creates in the society it would have been easier to find alternatives soon and we could have been plastic free. It is difficult to change human habits if they slowly inculcate in their lifestyles.
Regulators and policymakers should always consider these potential environmental threats, today it is easier to get correct predictions and insights with development of real time prediction models. A boon in computer technology, AI could be used to solidify actions against potential threats by giving insights about the future.
To sum it up, it is always better to respond to possible environmental threats now, than to leave it as a burden for our posterity. Every environmental threat now, was a potential threat back in years. As a duty the decision makers should not wait for effects to confirm it, rather prevent it when it is budding.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 295.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14237288136 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01239753008 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586440677966 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.0892478688 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.133333333 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.93333333333 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171391293801 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558232863857 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520602379798 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10075118868 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427814191534 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.