Last year PrepUp had record enrollment in their test prep courses but yearly profits fellby nearly 30 percent To the contrary TopPreparation had comparable enrollment to the year before with profits rising by approximately 20 percent This discrepancy

There are two situations to compare with - first let's talk about Toppreparations: there wasn't a significant rise in their enrollment numbers but gained increased 20% profit. On the other hand Prep classes even after having record enrollment suffered a of 30% loss in profits. The difference which these institutes share lies in their teaching medium. While the later was more focused in live, in person teaching - TopPreparations shifted almost majority of their student to online medium.

As a solution to there increasing economical issue, Prep classes would be converting their teaching method to online. This by analogy could be best fir solution.

While offline classes require amenities and greater investments, online classes serve comparatively equal output. The cost for classrooms, electricity, security etc. could be eliminated. Increasing technology has enabled teachers to provide classroom like environment to students using online classes. So there would be no drop in teaching quality for Prep institute even if they are shifting from in-person lectures.

After the recent pandemic, there is a significant change in our life styles. The solution which prep classes came up is very much in tandem with this change. People are shifting towards virtual practices more than they were in the past. TopPreparations adapted to these changes and provided both modes as a option to it's users. If the fees for both those courses (online and offline) was same, then they saved a lot on offline requirements and still provided the same quality of course to their students.

For Prep classes, with increase in enrollment the cost to manage offline classes and making arrangements for the same would have resulted in economic strain. In online mode they could considerably reduce the fees to increase student intake while maintaining their respective profit margin and stand against their market coompetitors.

One important point which is missing in the given argument is whether both Prep or TopPreparation were charging same fees from the students? this could also be one of the profit affecting factor.

To sum up the argument, I feel the decision to convert classes into online medium could be a boost for Prep institute.

Votes
Average: 5.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... lets talk about Toppreparations: there wasnt a significant rise in their enrollment ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...after having record enrollment suffered a of 30% loss in profits. The difference ...
^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the best'.
Suggestion: be the best
...method to online. This by analogy could be best fir solution. While offline classes ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hese changes and provided both modes as a option to its users. If the fees for bo...
^
Line 11, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e charging same fees from the students? this could also be one of the profit affecti...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, then, while, i feel, of course, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 353.0 441.139720559 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37110481586 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81228353881 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57507082153 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5221944058 57.8364921388 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2857142857 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8095238095 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.70786347227 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.20758483034 183% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144464303728 0.218282227539 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432469012502 0.0743258471296 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447741408026 0.0701772020484 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741805120219 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532400305645 0.0628817314937 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 98.500998004 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

out of topics
=============

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 354 350
No. of Characters: 1834 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.338 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.181 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.728 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 138 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.632 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.884 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.474 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.298 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.589 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.044 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 7 5