Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by 30 percent. Potential employers, looking at this dramatic rise in grades, believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accurately reflect student achievement; as a result, Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs, Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors.
The argument stated above states that Omega University implemented the procedure that encourage students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of their professors. This procedure was implemented 15 years ago but the reason behind this is not clearly stated in the argument. It can be possible that students were not satisfied by the teaching method of their teachers or it can be possible that the Omega University was not getting proper result and improvement in their students that is why they had to implement such procedure.
After implementing the procedure to evaluate the teaching effectiveness by the students it is insinuated that the Omega professor has begun to assign higher grades in their class and also overall student grade at Omega have risen by 30 percent. It can be possible that the teacher for having good grades may not be so strict while checking paper. It can be possible that for personal gain teachers set the paper easier as compared to the previous years. It can also be possible that the students due to the terror of getting low grades to give good grading to their teachers.
It has been stated that the students of Omega University have not been successful in getting the jobs as have graduated from Alpha University. Although the grading is good of the Omega University they are not able to secure the job after graduation is a concern of worry about the University. But comparing it with the Alpha University and making a decision is invalid. It can be possible that the Alpha University could have a strong connection with companies who offer jobs and companies give first preference to the Alpha University in comparison with the Omega University.
Omega University for getting the secure jobs to the students is seeking to terminate the student evaluation of grading their teachers. But deciding it on merely the basis of not getting the jobs is invalid. It can be possible that Alpha University possesses trained and more teacher staffs and hence the students to progress well and are able to get the secure job in the future. Also, it can be possible that Alpha University provides training to their students as a job prospective by arranging and focussing on soft skills. Rather than terminating the evaluation process the Omega University can appoint good teachers and can arrange special programs for guiding their students how to acquire jobs. A special team of teachers can be appointed to ensure that the students are well acquainted and prepared for jobs. If teachers will be good automatically the grading will also increase and also the students will get a proper job in the future.
In conclusion, the Omega University should not terminate the evaluation process merely on the basis of the students not getting a job after graduation. Rather they should focus on the subjects where students are lacking and should arrange some training programs so that students should get acquainted by the job procedures and can secure their future by getting jobs.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 501 350
No. of Characters: 2474 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.731 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.938 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.647 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 182 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 143 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 110 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.05 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.826 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.65 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.389 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.155 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...onal gain teachers set the paper easier as compared to the previous years. It can ...
^^
Line 4, column 455, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sier as compared to the previous years. It can also be possible that the students ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ive good grading to their teachers. It has been stated that the students of Om...
^^
Line 6, column 266, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...he job after graduation is a concern of worry for the University. But comparing it with t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 153, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...nts not getting a job after graduation. Rather they should focus on the subjects where...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.9520958084 162% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 28.8173652695 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2514.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 501.0 441.139720559 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01796407186 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69351201077 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 204.123752495 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.363273453094 0.468620217663 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 800.1 705.55239521 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4670344775 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.7 119.503703932 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.05 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.70786347227 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322654525684 0.218282227539 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126378288074 0.0743258471296 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124008537861 0.0701772020484 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209835194723 0.128457276422 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846667991107 0.0628817314937 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.