Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Failure is the key to success, every failure teaches us something or better. Due to failure we become stronger and get the energy to fight even better. Every individual faces failure in some phase of their life. Leaders are those who learn from their failure and try hard not to commit it again. They learn from their mistakes and make progress. So stating that understanding the past is of little use in the current position of leadership is fallacious.
Leaders who are in current position have to look to the past results to observe that what tasks are completed and what are pending. They have to make a keen observation that what the mistakes the predecessor make and what they don’t have to repeat. If the leaders make the same mistakes then their leadership will be blamed and accused of their work. Every person learns from their mistakes and makes progress in their life and not to follow the same mistake again is sagacious. They use their failure as inspiration in their life and leads on the path of success. Best leaders are not those who ignore their failures and don’t learn from them they are those who learn from other failures too and try not to repeat them again.
There is no person who has not experience the taste of failure. The scientist has to seek the mistakes that have been occurred in the respective fields and then think in different directions. Millions of dollars are invested in the experiments and if they fail again and repeat the same mistakes they will not get the desired result and also they will suffer a huge loss. In NASA, the satellites that are designed are checked thousands of time and if some mistakes occur they can suffer humongous loss and also if the next satellite is made they precisely observe each and every detail without repeating the previous mistakes again. Mistakes occur, its tendency of human to make mistakes but crucial is that not to repeat the same mistake again. APJ Abdul Kalam had made many mistakes in their life but he stood out from all odds and emerge himself as a powerful leader and made remarkable recognition in the world of history. Founder of Alibaba company, Jack Ma, he failed various times in his life and rose again to face all the oddities and made a billion dollar company by learning from his failure.
The President and Prime Ministers are the leaders of the nation. They have to take each and every decision in the betterment of people. When a new Prime Minister or President is selected they have to look the past records of the predecessor government and have to make sure that they don’t repeat the same mistakes the previous government did in their regime. They have to make sure that they take a decision that is valid and which will not affect the status of the country.
To conclude, want to emphasize on that it is erroneous to purport that past is of little importance to current leaders because of the failures that the previous leaders made it is always better for the current leaders to learn from it and not to repeat same mistakes again. Thus, it is very important for the current leader to understand past records.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'faces'' or 'face's', 'fax's'?
Suggestion: faces'; face's; fax's
... to fight even better. Every individual faces failure in some phase of their life. Le...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Best'.
Suggestion: The Best
... life and leads on the path of success. Best leaders are not those who ignore their ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'experienced'.
Suggestion: experienced
...gain. There is no person who has not experience the taste of failure. The scientist has...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2595.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 552.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70108695652 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3676302597 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403985507246 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 824.4 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1651403988 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.08 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.68 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14265293484 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568422787595 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133703507261 0.0758088955206 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108324920151 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899974395468 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.