The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to wide

Essay topics:

The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper.

"Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to
widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. Opponents note that last year's addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. Their suggested
alternative proposal is adding a bicycle lane to Blue Highway.Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute, it is argued, thereby reducing rush-hour
traffic."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidences is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen argument.

The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper. Author had drwan conclusion by comparing traffic situation between Blue Highway and Green away, that reducing rush hour traffic by encouraging commuters to use bicycle. The argument seem plausble at some glance, but it's flawed agrument. There are several assumption made by author which need an specific evidence. Before the argument comes towards actual let us look in given arguments.

Firstly, author has mention that commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic in Blue Highway between the suburbs and city center has doubled their commuting time. Author need evidence of road which connect city center and suburbs, it might road situation such as if road in very poor condition means such as big pits, so the driver may drive slowly and resulting in increasing in time. It might possiblity that increase in two wheeler and four wheeler user, people prefferd to travel by their own vehicle.We just don't no exact ratio of people and there use of vehicle.

Secondly, Author has drawn plausible point that favored proposal of motorists lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. Author need evidence such as distance between suburbs and city center and find out an another root.We just don't no distances of suburbs and city center. furthur, author made comparision between Blue Highway and Green Highway.Green Highway was followed by worsening of traffic jams last year by adding additional lane.author had drawn point in the previous year situation, we don't no current situation of Green highway.

Lastly, author made point towards convincing for residential to use bicycle. Author made strong assumption that many area resident are keen bicyclist. Author need data of residential who have bicycle and who prefer ride bicycle. Even if, bicycle lane would encourage bicyclists to commute to use. Whether they really encourage because of if some one who is delivery agent so that he not work eficiently by bicycle. Even if it seem acceptable that for reducing rush hour traffic author put an alternative option of bicycle, so whether it's affect to positive or negative towards residential.

In an conclusion, author need to check all the point before implement. Argument becomes weak arguments because of lack of specific evidence, to strengthen argument author need provide evidences.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sh hour traffic by encouraging commuters to use bicycle. The argument seem plausb...
^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun assumption seems to be countable; consider using: 'several assumptions'.
Suggestion: several assumptions
...nce, but its flawed agrument. There are several assumption made by author which need an specific e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'assumptions'?
Suggestion: assumptions
... its flawed agrument. There are several assumption made by author which need an specific e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...al assumption made by author which need an specific evidence. Before the argument ...
^^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...author which need an specific evidence. Before the argument comes towards actual let u...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'wheeler' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'wheelers'.
Suggestion: wheelers
...t might possiblity that increase in two wheeler and four wheeler user, people prefferd ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: We
...prefferd to travel by their own vehicle.We just dont no exact ratio of people and ...
^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... to travel by their own vehicle.We just dont no exact ratio of people and there use ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: ADD_AN_ADDITIONAL[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'adding a lane'.
Suggestion: adding a lane
...otorists lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. Author need evidence such a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a root' or 'another root'.
Suggestion: a root; another root
...en suburbs and city center and find out an another root.We just dont no distances of suburbs an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: We
...ity center and find out an another root.We just dont no distances of suburbs and c...
^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...er and find out an another root.We just dont no distances of suburbs and city center...
^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthur
...o distances of suburbs and city center. furthur, author made comparision between Blue H...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Green
... between Blue Highway and Green Highway.Green Highway was followed by worsening of tr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...oint in the previous year situation, we dont no current situation of Green highway. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'bicycled'.
Suggestion: bicycled
...uthor need data of residential who have bicycle and who prefer ride bicycle. Even if, b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...her they really encourage because of if some one who is delivery agent so that he not wo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
... work eficiently by bicycle. Even if it seem acceptable that for reducing rush hour ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 4, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...or negative towards residential. In an conclusion, author need to check all th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.6327345309 25% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 380.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29473684211 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61259468145 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1340090382 57.8364921388 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.894736842 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 5.70786347227 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 5.25449101796 362% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317384271551 0.218282227539 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984989677319 0.0743258471296 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140601195622 0.0701772020484 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163826186949 0.128457276422 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108266210379 0.0628817314937 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.3799401198 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 12 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 13 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 386 350
No. of Characters: 1961 1500
No. of Different Words: 200 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.432 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.08 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.513 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 159 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 124 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.637 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.331 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.563 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.107 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5