In the preceding argument, the author claims that the population of the Balmar island has increased to 100.000 during the summer that lead to significant rise on the mopeds accidents and the government has to reduce the number, the conclusion of the argument is based on the following premises. Firstly, they have to limit the number of mopeds renting to 25 per day that will lead to decrease number of accidents to 50 percent. Secondly, he bolsters his assumption by giving island of seaville as a successful example of reduction the mopeds accidents.
To begin with, the readily states that the government has to reduce renting the mopeds from 50 to 25 per day during the summer. Thus, in order to this assumption to be convincing, several question would need to be answered. Firstly, we would need to know what is the relation between using the mopeds and the accidents? But more than this, we would need to know what kind of accidents result from the mopeds usage? What is the other factors that lead to increase number of accidents Why these accidents did not appear in the past? All these question undermine the assumption and in order to strengthen it he has to answer them precisely.
Secondly, the author assumes that by reduction usage of mopeds this will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents, but he fails to provide evidence toward the number from where he concluded it? Moreover, a miscalculation of the number could also completely undermine the conclusion, perhaps there are another factor that lead to increase the accidents rate such as broken roads, bad infrastructures or the roads very tight to compensate all the population or what about number of cars, are the same"? Hence, no thing toward bolster the assumption and the author has to do full assessment for the Island to discover the real cause of the accidents expansion.
Thirdly, the argument assumes that the two islands are the same, but is the number of residents are the same, or is island of Seaville has the same nature perhaps there are sharp mountains lead to more accidents or what about their government vision is it the same of Balmar island?, actually, we do not have any reliable information about the Seaville island. So, the argument fails to provide any justification, and the difference between the islands could be the sources of the success for the Seaville island and is not mandatory that what works with them will work with Balmar island. In sum, the assumption is without basis and the argument would have been stronger if provide answers on all questions.
In conclusion. the argument fails to provide one of the key factor. Namely, all the assumptions are equivocal. So, without complete information and answering all the questions, the argument is unsubstantiated and opened to debate.
- tpo 27 76
- tpo 30 61
- Nowadays we live in very complex modern life. So, we have to do many and different task to fill our days in fruitful tasks. While, others prefer doing one task in all their day long. And in my point of view doing many tasks is very important to live more 70
- tpo 18 80
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 475 350
No. of Characters: 2283 1500
No. of Different Words: 191 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.668 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.806 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.617 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 170 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 117 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 86 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.389 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.484 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.579 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.196 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun question seems to be countable; consider using: 'several questions'.
Suggestion: several questions
...er to this assumption to be convincing, several question would need to be answered. Firstly, we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mopeds'' or 'moped's'?
Suggestion: mopeds'; moped's
... what kind of accidents result from the mopeds usage? What is the other factors that l...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nothing'?
Suggestion: nothing
...ber of cars, are the same'? Hence, no thing toward bolster the assumption and the a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 660, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'accidents'' or 'accident's'?
Suggestion: accidents'; accident's
...sland to discover the real cause of the accidents expansion. Thirdly, the argument ass...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of residents are the same, or is island of Seaville has the same nature p...
^^
Line 9, column 16, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ers on all questions. In conclusion. the argument fails to provide one of the ke...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, as to, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 55.5748502994 133% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 16.3942115768 183% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 2260.96107784 104% => OK
No of words: 475.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95578947368 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71440519596 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 204.123752495 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429473684211 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.0 705.55239521 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.7141258657 57.8364921388 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.777777778 119.503703932 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3888888889 23.324526521 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 5.70786347227 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230663843283 0.218282227539 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669781346164 0.0743258471296 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701705294586 0.0701772020484 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131158614408 0.128457276422 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850385578067 0.0628817314937 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 98.500998004 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.