The letter provides information about two major real estate firms in a town. On one hand Adams Realty being the best firm to Fitch Realty due to few factors and on the other hand an incident that occurred ten years ago. However, the author's argument is not highly effective to allow such tenable conclusion because of lack of relevant evidence and assumption. Hence, the author's argument is unsubstantiated and deeply flawed.
To begin with, the argument stated that Adams Realty is superior to Fitch Realty because of the fact that it has more employees almost doubled that of Fitch Realty whose employees only work part-time. This assumption sounds true at first glance but does not justify the reason why Adams Realty should hold superiority because the numbers of employee a firm employs does not depend on how great such company would become but the effectiveness and competencies of its workers whether small or large. Such argument shows no clear evidence about it, thus, does not hold water. Although, the writer presented that Adam's revenue last year was greater than that of Fitch by two-fold as well as its home sales by almost $20000 (Adams' home sales- $168000) but the author only gave instances of a year income. What if Fitch Realty made greater income in previous years than the other firm?, this was not stated in the letter thereby suggesting that such argument is without solid grounds.
In addition, another flaw is that the author concluded that Adams sell homes quicker with a good price after comparing a situation which occurred ten years ago with Flitch and last year with Adams. Conversely, the writer could have given a wrong impression about the Flitch Realty because he did not investigate if they have improved in their services or not presently, rather still carried the same believe of what happened over a decade ago. The argument is however fallacious and need some concrete evidence by the author of the passage to warrant his claims in the passage
Conclusively, the argument seems very unconvincing because the assertions made by the author to weigh both firms are not tangible enough to conclude that Adams Realty is the best to sell ones home. The author should have considered other factors such as efficiency of employees, type of houses sold by both firms and their customer services, maybe then could the assumptions be reasonable.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...being the best firm to Fitch Realty due to few factors and on the other hand an in...
^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...at occurred ten years ago. However, the authors argument is not highly effective to all...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ant evidence and assumption. Hence, the authors argument is unsubstantiated and deeply ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...dams Realty is superior to Fitch Realty because of the fact that it has more employees almost doubled th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f Fitch Realty whose employees only work part-time. This assumption sounds true a...
^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d grounds. In addition, another flaw is that the author concluded that Adams ...
^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, the argument seems very unconvincing because the assertions made by the autho...
^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e that Adams Realty is the best to sell ones home. The author should have considered...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 398.0 441.139720559 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97989949749 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45194206671 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 204.123752495 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.5473882805 57.8364921388 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.461538462 119.503703932 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6153846154 23.324526521 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 5.70786347227 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272423041178 0.218282227539 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989750867419 0.0743258471296 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897314873704 0.0701772020484 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161709681458 0.128457276422 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090243035821 0.0628817314937 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.3799401198 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...being the best firm to Fitch Realty due to few factors and on the other hand an in...
^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...at occurred ten years ago. However, the authors argument is not highly effective to all...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ant evidence and assumption. Hence, the authors argument is unsubstantiated and deeply ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...dams Realty is superior to Fitch Realty because of the fact that it has more employees almost doubled th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f Fitch Realty whose employees only work part-time. This assumption sounds true a...
^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d grounds. In addition, another flaw is that the author concluded that Adams ...
^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, the argument seems very unconvincing because the assertions made by the autho...
^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e that Adams Realty is the best to sell ones home. The author should have considered...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 398.0 441.139720559 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97989949749 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45194206671 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 204.123752495 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.5473882805 57.8364921388 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.461538462 119.503703932 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6153846154 23.324526521 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 5.70786347227 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272423041178 0.218282227539 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989750867419 0.0743258471296 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897314873704 0.0701772020484 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161709681458 0.128457276422 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090243035821 0.0628817314937 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.3799401198 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.